Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22420604›Full record

ReviewPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2012

Preclinical pharmacology and opioid combinations.

Gavril W Pasternak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Substance use disorders: diagnosis and management for hospitalists.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A Retrospective comparative study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Neoclerodanes as atypical opioid receptor ligands.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gavril W PasternakLaboratory of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA. pasterng@mskcc.org
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Synthesis &Pharmacology of Novel Opiates and SystemsR01DA006241 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PAN, YING-XIAN · 1990 to 2018
$6.4M
PHARMACOLOGY OF OPIOID RECEPTOR SUBTYPESR01DA007242 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PAN, YING-XIAN · 1991 to 2022
$6.0M
Biochemical Characterization of Opioid ReceptorsR01DA002615 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 1985 to 2010
$4.9M
PHARMACOLOGY OF OPIOID RECEPTOR SUBTYPESR37DA007242 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 1996 to 2004
$1.5M
Biochemical Characterization of Opioid BInding SitesR56DA002615 · NIDA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI PASTERNAK, GAVRIL W · 2012 to 2013
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS DA02615NIDA NIH HHS DA06241NIDA NIH HHS DA07242NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002615NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA006241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS R56 DA002615NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although effective alone, opioids are often used in combination with other drugs for relief of moderate to severe pain. Guidelines for acute perioperative pain recommend the use of multimodal therapy for pain management, although combinations of opioids are not specifically recommended. Mu opioid drugs include morphine, heroin, fentanyl, methadone, and morphine 6β-glucuronide (M6G). Their mechanism of action is complex, resulting in subtle pharmacological differences among them and with unpredictable differences in their potency, effectiveness, and tolerability among patients. Highly selective mu opioids do not bind to a single receptor. Rather, they interact with a large number of mu receptor subtypes with different activation profiles for the various drugs. Thus, mu-receptor-based drugs are not all the same and it may be possible to utilize these differences for enhanced pain control in a clinical setting. These differences among the drugs raise the question of whether combinations might result in better pain relief with fewer side effects. This concept has already been demonstrated between two mu opioids in preclinical studies and clinical trials on other combinations are ongoing. This article reviews the current state of knowledge about mu opioid receptor pharmacology, summarizes preclinical evidence for synergy from opioid combinations, and highlights the complex nature of the mu opioid receptor pharmacology.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPainReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID22420604
PMCPMC3307386
OpenAlexW1933299353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.