Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419986›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2011

Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods.

Mark L Palmeri, Kathryn R Nightingale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Focal Volume, Acoustic Radiation Force, and Strain in Two-Transducer Regimes.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantitative Viscoelastic Response (QVisR): Direct Estimation of Viscoelasticity With Neural Networks.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  8. Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  9. Focused Shear Wave Beam Propagation in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Differences in Medial and Lateral Gastrocnemius Stiffness after Exercise-Induced Muscle Fatigue.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging Using Nondiffractive Bessel Apodized Acoustic Radiation Force.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  17. Feasibility and safety of antepartum tactile imaging.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark L PalmeriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering , Duke University , Durham, NC 27708 , USA.
Kathryn R Nightingale

Funding

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Imaging of Cardiac TissueR37HL096023 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TRAHEY, GREGG E. · 2009 to 2018
$5.2M
Radiation Force Imaging of Prostate Cancer and Guidance of Biopsy ProceduresR01CA142824 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2010 to 2021
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142824NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL096023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional diagnostic ultrasound images portray differences in the acoustic properties of soft tissues, whereas ultrasound-based elasticity images portray differences in the elastic properties of soft tissues (i.e. stiffness, viscosity). The benefit of elasticity imaging lies in the fact that many soft tissues can share similar ultrasonic echogenicities, but may have different mechanical properties that can be used to clearly visualize normal anatomy and delineate pathological lesions. Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods use acoustic radiation force to transiently deform soft tissues, and the dynamic displacement response of those tissues is measured ultrasonically and is used to estimate the tissue's mechanical properties. Both qualitative images and quantitative elasticity metrics can be reconstructed from these measured data, providing complimentary information to both diagnose and longitudinally monitor disease progression. Recently, acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging techniques have moved from the laboratory to the clinical setting, where clinicians are beginning to characterize tissue stiffness as a diagnostic metric, and commercial implementations of radiation force-based ultrasonic elasticity imaging are beginning to appear on the commercial market. This article provides an overview of acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging, including a review of the relevant soft tissue material properties, a review of radiation force-based methods that have been proposed for elasticity imaging, and a discussion of current research and commercial realizations of radiation force based-elasticity imaging technologies.

Indexed as

acoustic radiation forceelasticityshear wavestiffnessultrasound

Identifiers

PMID22419986
PMCPMC3262278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.