Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419711›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2012

Clinical review: Screening for coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes.

Charles T Upchurch, Eugene J Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles T UpchurchUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA. Charles.upchurch@virginia.edu
Eugene J Barrett

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN DIABETES AND HORMONES ACTIONT32DK007320 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI BARRETT, EUGENE JOSEPH · 1986 to 2012
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007320NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK007320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical contextSensitive tools are available to diagnose occult ischemic and atherosclerotic coronary disease, yet screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been shown to reduce cardiac events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Professional guidelines are inconsistent regarding CAD screening recommendations, but it is suggested that those at highest risk (10-yr risk ≥20%) for cardiac events may benefit. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reviewed bibliographies of professional CAD screening guidelines, review articles, and clinical trials published within the last 10 yr, although we have included relevant older studies. We excluded studies that did not focus on T2DM or explicitly analyze that subgroup. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Although screening for coronary ischemia or atherosclerosis does provide incremental prognostic information in patients with T2DM and previously undiagnosed CAD, this has not been found to significantly impact outcomes. This appears to result from comparable efficacy of revascularization and optimal medical therapy in stable CAD. Limited evidence supports the hypothesis that those with more severe CAD (three-vessel, left main, proximal left anterior descending) amenable to bypass surgery may be potential beneficiaries of screening. However, the low prevalence of such candidates in the asymptomatic population, continuing advances with percutaneous intervention, and the lack of prospective trials makes such a recommendation currently unsupportable.

conclusionsFindings to date do not support widespread screening for CAD in patients with T2DM. A future strategy identifying those at highest risk as screening candidates may ultimately be effective, but the optimal method for selecting those subjects or subsequent treatment is unknown.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22419711
PMCPMC3339889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.