Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419370›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2012

A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide.

J A Kanis, A Odén, E V McCloskey, H Johansson, D A Wahl, C Cooper, IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 689 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
689citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03130673 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Hip Fracture Epidemiology at Hospital Regional Rafael Hernandez. September 2014 to March 2015.

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital del Niño "Dr. José Renán Esquivel"Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsHip Fractures
NCT04851509 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Static Helical Screw Locking of Pertrochanteric Femur Fractures Using the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System - a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFraser Orthopaedic Research SocietyRan2021 to 2027Enrolled218ConditionsPertrochanteric FractureArmsDynamic Rotational Locking, Static Locking
NCT05025228 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Analgesic Effect of Paracetamol in Patients With Femur Fracture: is Intravenous Better Than Oral?

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2019 to 2020Enrolled170ConditionsFemur FractureArmsParacetamol
NCT07709377 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence-Based Analysis of Risk Factors and Risk Prediction Model for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Hip Fracture Surgery in the Elderly

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBeijing Anzhen HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsHip Fracture, MACE, Elderly, Perioperative Complications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

689 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Guideline
  6. Gender differences between smoking and the risk of hip fracture.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Increasing mobility while in hospital after hip fracture: even the best evidence may not translate to all national health services.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

629 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J A KanisWHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, UK. w.j.pontefract@sheffield.ac.uk
A Odén
E V McCloskey
H Johansson
D A Wahl
C Cooper
IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe country-specific risk of hip fracture and the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture were determined on a worldwide basis from a systematic review of literature. There was a greater than 10-fold variation in hip fracture risk and fracture probability between countries.

introductionThe present study aimed to update the available information base available on the heterogeneity in the risk of hip fracture on a worldwide basis. An additional aim was to document variations in major fracture probability as determined from the available FRAX models.

methodsStudies on hip fracture risk were identified from 1950 to November 2011 by a Medline OVID search. Evaluable studies in each country were reviewed for quality and representativeness and a study (studies) chosen to represent that country. Age-specific incidence rates were age-standardised to the world population in 2010 in men, women and both sexes combined. The 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture for a specific clinical scenario was computed in those countries for which a FRAX model was available.

resultsFollowing quality evaluation, age-standardised rates of hip fracture were available for 63 countries and 45 FRAX models available in 40 countries to determine fracture probability. There was a greater than 10-fold variation in hip fracture risk and fracture probability between countries.

conclusionsWorldwide, there are marked variations in hip fracture rates and in the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures. The variation is sufficiently large that these cannot be explained by the often multiple sources of error in the ascertainment of cases or the catchment population. Understanding the reasons for this heterogeneity may lead to global strategies for the prevention of fractures.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAgedFemaleGlobal HealthHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMaleOsteoporotic FracturesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22419370
PMCPMC3421108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.