Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419336›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Follow-up for improving psychological well being for women after a miscarriage.

Fiona A Murphy, Allyson Lipp, Diane L Powles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to Improve Outcomes After Pregnancy Loss: A Systematic Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medical management of first trimester miscarriage: a quality improvement initiative.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pregnancy complications and later life women's health.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. The experiences of men following recurrent miscarriage in an Irish tertiary hospital: A qualitative analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona A MurphyCollege of Human & Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.f.murphy@swan.ac.uk.
Allyson Lipp
Diane L Powles
University of South Wales · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/4001/02Department of Health SRP/10/4001/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMiscarriage is the premature expulsion of an embryo or fetus from the uterus up to 23 weeks of pregnancy and weighing up to 500 grams. International studies using diagnostic tools have identified that some women suffer from anxiety, depression and grief after miscarriage. Psychological follow-up might detect those women who are at risk of psychological complications following miscarriage. This review is necessary as the evidence is equivocal on the benefits of psychological follow-up after miscarriage.

objectivesWhether follow-up affects the psychological well being of women following miscarriage. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 December 2011), reference lists of all retrieved papers and contacted professional and lay organisations to obtain any ongoing trials or unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All potential trials for eligibility according to the criteria specified in the protocol by screening the titles and abstracts, retrieving full reports of potentially relevant trials for assessment. All review authors extracted data and checked for accuracy. No studies were published in duplicate. When data were missing and only the abstract was available, we attempted to contact the trial authors. We resolved any disagreement through discussion. MAIN

resultsSix studies involving 1001 women were included. Three trials compared one counselling session with no counselling. There was no significant difference in psychological well being including anxiety, grief, depression avoidance and self-blame. One trial compared three one-hour counselling sessions with no counselling at four and 12 months. Some subscales showed statistical significance in favour of counselling and some in favour of no counselling. The results for two trials were given in narrative form as data were unavailable for meta-analyses. One trial compared multiple interventions. The other trial compared two counselling sessions with no counselling. Neither study favoured counselling. AUTHORS'

conclusionsEvidence is insufficient to demonstrate that psychological support such as counselling is effective post-miscarriage. Further trials should be good quality, adequately-powered using standardised interventions and outcome measures at specific time points. The economic implications and women's satisfaction with psychological follow-up should also be explored in any future study.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAnxietyCounselingDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyPsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID22419336
PMCPMC4164469
OpenAlexW1846596448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.