Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419335›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists for urticaria.

Zbys Fedorowicz, Esther J van Zuuren, Nianfang Hu

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Immunopathogenesis of itch: an integrative framework for chronic pruritus.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Urticaria.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Diagnosis and treatment of urticaria in primary care.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2019
    Review
  15. Can HBritish journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  16. Urticaria and angioedema.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Review
  17. Is antihistaminergic H2 really useful in prevention of hypersensitivity induced by paclitaxel?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Management of urticaria: not too complicated, not too simple.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
    Review
  20. Insights and advances in chronic urticaria: a Canadian perspective.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zbys FedorowiczUKCC (Bahrain Branch), Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Box 25438, Awali, Bahrain. zbysfedo@batelco.com.bh
Esther J van Zuuren
Nianfang Hu
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Bahrain · BHWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrticaria is a common skin disease characterised by itching weals or hives, which can occur almost anywhere on the body. There are a number of different subtypes and a range of available treatment options. There is lack of agreement on the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists used in the treatment of urticaria.

objectivesTo assess the safety and effectiveness of H2-receptor antagonists in the treatment of urticaria. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the following databases up to 7 October 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2007), and LILACS (from 1982). We also searched online trials registries for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of H2-receptor antagonists in people with a clinical diagnosis of urticaria of any duration or of any subtype. Studies including H1-antihistamines for chronic urticaria are the topic of a separate Cochrane review; thus, they were not included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted and analysed data. MAIN

resultsFour studies of a relatively small size, involving 144 participants, were included in this review. A combination of ranitidine with diphenhydramine was more effective at improving the resolution of urticaria than diphenhydramine administered alone (risk ratio (RR) 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 2.36). Although there was a similar improvement in itching, weal size, and intensity, cimetidine provided no statistically significant greater overall improvement in symptoms of urticaria when compared to diphenhydramine. However, a combination of these medications was more effective than diphenhydramine alone (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.94). Adverse events were reported with several of the interventions, i.e. ranitidine and diphenhydramine, causing drowsiness and sedation, but there was no significant difference in the level of sedation from baseline with either famotidine or diphenhydramine. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe very limited evidence provided by this review was based on a few old studies of a relatively small size, which we categorised as having high to unclear risk of bias. Thus, at present, the review does not allow confident decision-making about the use of H2-receptor antagonists for urticaria. Although some of these studies have reported a measure of relief of symptoms of urticaria and rather minimal clinical improvement in some of the participants, the evidence was weak and unreliable. We have emphasised the lack of precision and limitations in the reported data where appropriate in this review.

Indexed as

CimetidineDiphenhydramineDrug Therapy, CombinationFamotidineHistamine H1 AntagonistsHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRanitidineUrticariaCimetidineDiphenhydramineFamotidineHistamine H1 AntagonistsHistamine H2 AntagonistsRanitidine

Identifiers

PMID22419335
PMCPMC7390502
OpenAlexW1588167801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.