SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Histamine H2-receptor antagonists for urticaria.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2019Guideline
- H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Immunopathogenesis of itch: an integrative framework for chronic pruritus.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Review
- Beyond Antihistamines: How Biologic and Small-Molecule Therapies Are Transforming Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Care in Adults.Clinical drug investigation · 2025Review
- Review
- Urticaria.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024Review
- Antioxidant and Anti-Glycation Potential of H2 Receptor Antagonists-In Vitro Studies and a Systematic Literature Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Guidelines for the management of chronic spontaneous urticaria: recommendations supported by the Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology.The British journal of dermatology · 2021Article
- H2-antagonist in IgE-mediated type I hypersensitivity reactions: what literature says so far?Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2021Article
- Moxibustion therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
- Canadian expert consensus: management of hypersensitivity reactions to intravenous iron in adults.Vox sanguinis · 2019Review
- Prevention and management of acute reactions to intravenous iron in surgical patients.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2019Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of urticaria in primary care.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2019Review
- Can HBritish journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Urticaria and angioedema.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018Review
- Is antihistaminergic H2 really useful in prevention of hypersensitivity induced by paclitaxel?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Advances in Understanding and Managing Chronic Urticaria.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Management of urticaria: not too complicated, not too simple.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015Review
- Insights and advances in chronic urticaria: a Canadian perspective.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrticaria is a common skin disease characterised by itching weals or hives, which can occur almost anywhere on the body. There are a number of different subtypes and a range of available treatment options. There is lack of agreement on the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists used in the treatment of urticaria.
objectivesTo assess the safety and effectiveness of H2-receptor antagonists in the treatment of urticaria. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the following databases up to 7 October 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2007), and LILACS (from 1982). We also searched online trials registries for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of H2-receptor antagonists in people with a clinical diagnosis of urticaria of any duration or of any subtype. Studies including H1-antihistamines for chronic urticaria are the topic of a separate Cochrane review; thus, they were not included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted and analysed data. MAIN
resultsFour studies of a relatively small size, involving 144 participants, were included in this review. A combination of ranitidine with diphenhydramine was more effective at improving the resolution of urticaria than diphenhydramine administered alone (risk ratio (RR) 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 2.36). Although there was a similar improvement in itching, weal size, and intensity, cimetidine provided no statistically significant greater overall improvement in symptoms of urticaria when compared to diphenhydramine. However, a combination of these medications was more effective than diphenhydramine alone (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.94). Adverse events were reported with several of the interventions, i.e. ranitidine and diphenhydramine, causing drowsiness and sedation, but there was no significant difference in the level of sedation from baseline with either famotidine or diphenhydramine. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe very limited evidence provided by this review was based on a few old studies of a relatively small size, which we categorised as having high to unclear risk of bias. Thus, at present, the review does not allow confident decision-making about the use of H2-receptor antagonists for urticaria. Although some of these studies have reported a measure of relief of symptoms of urticaria and rather minimal clinical improvement in some of the participants, the evidence was weak and unreliable. We have emphasised the lack of precision and limitations in the reported data where appropriate in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.