Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419298›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Brett A Winter-Roach, Henry C Kitchener, Theresa A Lawrie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Topotecan for ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG): clinical trial design for rare ovarian tumours.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MiR-494 Inhibits Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Growth by Targeting c-Myc.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  15. MiR-1271 Inhibits Ovarian Cancer Growth by Targeting Cyclin G1.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Marital status and survival in patients with cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brett A Winter-RoachDepartment ofObstetrics and Gynaecology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane,Salford, UK. brett.winter-roach@srft.nhs.uk. brett.winter_roach@btinternet.com.
Henry C Kitchener
Theresa A Lawrie
Royal United Hospital · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt. Mary’s Hospital · ZA

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer is diagnosed in 4500 women in the UK each year of whom 1700 will ultimately die of their disease.Of all cases 10% to 15% are diagnosed early when there is still a good possibility of cure. The treatment of early stage disease involves surgery to remove disease often followed by chemotherapy. The largest clinical trials of this adjuvant therapy show an overall survival (OS) advantage with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy but the precise role of this treatment in subgroups of women with differing prognoses needs to be defined.

objectivesTo systematically review the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer to determine firstly whether there is a survival advantage of this treatment over the policy of observation following surgery with chemotherapy reserved for treatment of disease recurrence, and secondly to determine if clinical subgroups of differing prognosis based on histological sub-type, or completeness of surgical staging, have more or less to gain from chemotherapy following initial surgery. SEARCH

methodsWe performed an electronic search using the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2011, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1948 to Aug week 5, 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to week 36, 2011). We developed the search strategy using free-text and medical subject headings (MESH). SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria set out based on the populations, interventions, comparisons and outcome measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third review author. We performed random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses. MAIN

resultsFive randomised controlled trials (RCTs), enrolling 1277 women, with a median follow-up of 46 to 121 months, met the inclusion criteria. Four trials were included in the meta-analyses and we considered them to be at a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of five-year data from three trials indicated that women who received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not (1008 women; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.93). Likewise, meta-analysis of five-year data from four trials indicated that women who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better progression-free survival (PFS) than those who did not (1170 women; HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84). The trials included in these meta-analyses gave consistent estimates of the effects of chemotherapy. In addition, these findings were robust over time (10-year PFS: two trials, 925 women; HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.84).Subgroup analysis suggested that women who had optimal surgical staging of their disease were unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR for OS 1.22; 95% CI 0.63 to 2.37; two trials, 234 women) whereas those who had sub-optimal staging did (HR for OS 0.63; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.85; two trials, 772 women). One trial showed a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among women at high risk (HR for OS 0.48; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.72) but not among those at low/medium risk (HR for OS 0.95; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.66). However, these subgroup findings could be due to chance and should be interpreted with caution. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAdjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in prolonging the survival of the majority of patients who are assessed as having early (FIGO stage I/IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. However, it may be withheld from women in whom there is well-differentiated encapsulated unilateral disease (stage 1a grade 1) or those with comprehensively staged Ib, well or moderately differentiated (grade 1/2) disease. Others with unstaged early disease or those with poorly differentiated tumours should be offered chemotherapy. A pragmatic approach may be necessary in clinical settings where optimal staging is not normally performed/achieved. In such settings, adjuvant chemotherapy may be withheld from those with encapsulated stage Ia grade 1 serous and endometrioid carcinoma and offered to all others with early stage disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMelphalanNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID22419298
PMCPMC4164914
OpenAlexW4252070464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.