SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Human recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- An updated meta-analysis to understand the variable efficacy of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis and septic shock.Minerva anestesiologica · 2013Pooled it
- Human recombinant protein C for severe sepsis and septic shock in adult and paediatric patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Machine learning identifies clinical sepsis phenotypes that translate to the plasma proteome.Infection · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Purpura Fulminans as an Uncommon Postoperative Complication: A Case Series.Cureus · 2024Article
- An Fgr kinase inhibitor attenuates sepsis-associated encephalopathy by ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation via the SIRT1/PGC-1α signaling pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- How to recognize a trustworthy clinical practice guideline.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2023Review
- Inhalation of an RNA aptamer that selectively binds extracellular histones protects from acute lung injury.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Article
- Management Strategies in Septic Coagulopathy: A Review of the Current Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Organotypic heterogeneity in microvascular endothelial cell responses in sepsis-a molecular treasure trove and pharmacological Gordian knot.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Activated Protein C Ameliorates Tubular Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species and Inflammation in Diabetic Kidney Disease.Nutrients · 2022Article
- A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on Anticoagulant Therapy in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Therapeutic Effects of Endogenous Incretin Hormones and Exogenous Incretin-Based Medications in Sepsis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Review
- Activated Protein C in Cutaneous Wound Healing: From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Review
- Coagulopathies and inflammatory diseases: '…glimpse of a Snark'.Current opinion in immunology · 2018Review
- The biology of natural killer cells during sepsis.Immunology · 2018Review
- A Comparative Review of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Sepsis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a common and frequently fatal condition. Human recombinant activated protein C (APC) has been used to reduce the high rate of death by severe sepsis or septic shock. This is an update of a Cochrane review (originally published in 2007 and updated in 2008).
objectivesWe assessed the clinical effectiveness and safety of APC for the treatment of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. SEARCH
methodsFor this updated review we searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 6); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2010); EMBASE (1980 to July 1, 2010); BIOSIS (1965 to July 1, 2010); CINAHL (1982 to 16 June 2010) and LILACS (1982 to 16 June 2010). There was no language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of APC for severe sepsis in adults and children. We excluded studies on neonates. We considered all-cause mortality at day 28, at the end of study follow up, and hospital mortality as the primary outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. We estimated relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We measured statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We used a random-effects model. MAIN
resultsWe identified one new RCT in this update. We included a total of five RCTs involving 5101 participants. For 28-day mortality, APC did not reduce the risk of death in adult participants with severe sepsis (pooled RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.22; P = 0.82, I(2) = 68%). APC use was associated with an increased risk of bleeding (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.00; P = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). In paediatric patients, APC did not reduce the risk of death (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.46; P = 0.93). Although the included trials had no major limitations most of them modified their original completion or recruitment protocols. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis updated review found no evidence suggesting that APC should be used for treating patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Additionally, APC is associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Unless additional RCTs provide evidence of a treatment effect, policy-makers, clinicians and academics should not promote the use of APC.Warning: On October 25th 2011, the European Medicines Agency issued a press release on the worldwide withdrawal of Xigris (activated protein C / drotrecogin alfa) from the market by Eli Lilly due to lack of beneficial effect on 28-day mortality in the PROWESS-SHOCK study. Furthermore, Eli Lily has announced the discontinuation of all other ongoing clinical trials. The final results of the PROWESS-SHOCK study are expected to be published in 2012. This systematic review will be updated when results of the PROWESS-SHOCK or other trials are published.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.