SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insertion site of central venous catheter among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Vascular access specialist teams for device insertion and prevention of failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Normal saline versus heparin for patency of central venous catheters in adult patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access 2016.Anaesthesia · 2016Guideline
- Antimicrobial dressings for the prevention of catheter-related infections in newborn infants with central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2014Pooled it
- epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.The Journal of hospital infection · 2014Guideline
- Ultrasound-Guided In-Plane Subclavian Vein Puncture versus Prior Ultrasound and Landmark Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2026Trial
- Complications of intravascular catheters in ICU: definitions, incidence and severity. A randomized controlled trial comparing usual transparent dressings versus new-generation dressings (the ADVANCED study).Intensive care medicine · 2016Trial
- Clinical and Technical Factors Associated With Tunnelled Central Venous Catheter Dysfunction in Haemodialysis: A Multicentre Session-Level Retrospective Study.Nursing open · 2026Observational
- The risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection between internal jugular and subclavian sites in critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- When to remove implantable vascular access ports? a retrospective analysis of 376 patients with breast cancer and implantable vascular access ports.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Predictive Tool for Tunnelled Central Venous Catheter Dysfunction in Haemodialysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram risk prediction model for PICC-related thrombosis in children with hematological malignancies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Emergency Department Placed Central Lines for Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study on Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infection Risk From Central Lines Placed Emergently in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Complications associated with subsequent tunneled central venous access device placement in children: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Inversion of Central Venous Ports in Children Under Six Years Old: A Retrospective Analysis of 154 Oncology Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral venous access (CVA) is widely used. However, its thrombotic, stenotic and infectious complications can be life-threatening and involve high-cost therapy. Research revealed that the risk of catheter-related complications varied according to the site of CVA. It would be helpful to find the preferred site of insertion to minimize the risk of catheter-related complications. This review was originally published in 2007 and was updated in 2011.
objectives1. Our primary objective was to establish whether the jugular, subclavian or femoral CVA routes resulted in a lower incidence of venous thrombosis, venous stenosis or infections related to CVA devices in adult patients.2. Our secondary objective was to assess whether the jugular, subclavian or femoral CVA routes influenced the incidence of catheter-related mechanical complications in adult patients; and the reasons why patients left the studies early. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 9), MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE (from inception to September 2011), four Chinese databases (CBM, WANFANG DATA, CAJD, VIP Database) (from inception to November 2011), Google Scholar and bibliographies of published reviews. The original search was performed in December 2006. We also contacted researchers in the field. There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing central venous catheter insertion routes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors assessed potentially relevant studies independently. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Dichotomous data on catheter-related complications were analysed. We calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on a random-effects model. MAIN
resultsWe identified 5854 citations from the initial search strategy; 28 references were then identified as potentially relevant. Of these, we Included four studies with data from 1513 participants. We undertook a priori subgroup analysis according to the duration of catheterization, short-term (< one month) and long-term (> one month) defined according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).No randomized controlled trial (RCT) was found comparing all three CVA routes and reporting the complications of venous stenosis.Regarding internal jugular versus subclavian CVA routes, the evidence was moderate and applicable for long-term catheterization in cancer patients. Subclavian and internal jugular CVA routes had similar risks for catheter-related complications. Regarding femoral versus subclavian CVA routes, the evidence was high and applicable for short-term catheterization in critically ill patients. Subclavian CVA routes were preferable to femoral CVA routes in short-term catheterization because femoral CVA routes were associated with higher risks of catheter colonization (14.18% or 19/134 versus 2.21% or 3/136) (n = 270, one RCT, RR 6.43, 95% CI 1.95 to 21.21) and thrombotic complications (21.55% or 25/116 versus 1.87% or 2/107) (n = 223, one RCT, RR 11.53, 95% CI 2.80 to 47.52) than with subclavian CVA routes. Regarding femoral versus internal jugular routes, the evidence was moderate and applicable for short-term haemodialysis catheterization in critically ill patients. No significant differences were found between femoral and internal jugular CVA routes in catheter colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and thrombotic complications, but fewer mechanical complications occurred in femoral CVA routes (4.86% or 18/370 versus 9.56% or 35/366) (n = 736, one RCT, RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.88). AUTHORS'
conclusionsSubclavian and internal jugular CVA routes have similar risks for catheter-related complications in long-term catheterization in cancer patients. Subclavian CVA is preferable to femoral CVA in short-term catheterization because of lower risks of catheter colonization and thrombotic complications. In short-term haemodialysis catheterization, femoral and internal jugular CVA routes have similar risks for catheter-related complications except internal jugular CVA routes are associated with higher risks of mechanical complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.