Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22419280›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children.

Linjie Zhang, Sílvio O M Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The situation of vaccines for the prevention of infections in adults: An opinion paper on the situation in Spain.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Time since last vaccine dose in PCR-positive and PCR-negative children with suspected pertussis to monitor pertussis vaccine effectiveness.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  16. Pertussis Surveillance Trends in British Columbia, Canada, over a 20-year Period: 1993-2013.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2014
    Article
  17. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Linjie ZhangFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rua Visconde Paranaguá 102, Centro, RioGrande, RS, Brazil. zhanglinjie63@yahoo.com.br.
Sílvio O M Prietsch
Inge Axelsson
Scott A Halperin
Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande · BRUniversity of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College · US

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine use of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines was suspended in some countries in the 1970s and 1980s because of concerns about adverse effects. Following such action, there was a resurgence of whooping cough. Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, containing purified or recombinant Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) antigens, were developed in the hope that they would be as effective, but less reactogenic than the whole-cell vaccines.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of acellular pertussis vaccines in children. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1950 to December week 4, 2011), EMBASE (1974 to January 2012), Biosis Previews (2009 to January 2012), and CINAHL (2009 to January 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected double-blind randomised efficacy and safety trials of aP vaccines in children up to six years old, with active follow-up of participants and laboratory verification of pertussis cases. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the studies. Differences in trial design precluded a meta-analysis of the efficacy data. We pooled the safety data from individual trials using a random-effects meta-analysis model. MAIN

resultsWe included six efficacy trials with a total of 46,283 participants and 52 safety trials with a total of 136,541 participants. Most of the safety trials did not report the methods for random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding, which made it difficult to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The efficacy of multi-component (≥ three) vaccines varied from 84% to 85% in preventing typical whooping cough (characterised by 21 or more consecutive days of paroxysmal cough with confirmation of B. pertussis infection by culture, appropriate serology or contact with a household member who has culture-confirmed pertussis), and from 71% to 78% in preventing mild pertussis disease (characterised by seven or more consecutive days of cough with confirmation of B. pertussis infection by culture or appropriate serology). In contrast, the efficacy of one- and two-component vaccines varied from 59% to 75% against typical whooping cough and from 13% to 54% against mild pertussis disease. Multi-component acellular vaccines are more effective than low-efficacy whole-cell vaccines, but may be less effective than the highest-efficacy whole-cell vaccines. Most systemic and local adverse events were significantly less common with aP vaccines than with wP vaccines for the primary series as well as for the booster dose. AUTHORS'

conclusionsMulti-component (≥ three) aP vaccines are effective and show less adverse effects than wP vaccines for the primary series as well as for booster doses.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChildDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHumansPertussis VaccineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWhooping CoughDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccinePertussis Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID22419280
OpenAlexW4256152468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.