ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2012
Cost-effectiveness analysis of FET PET-guided target selection for the diagnosis of gliomas.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interval brain imaging for adults with cerebral glioma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Value of PET/CT with Different Tracers for Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of Published Meta-Analyses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro-oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Metabolic Heterogeneity in High-Grade Glioma Assessed by Multi-Tracer PET and Ex Vivo Metabolomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of treatment-related changes in children and adolescents with brain and spinal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis using MRI and [18 F]FET PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- An effective MRI perfusion threshold based workflow to triage additionalScientific reports · 2025Article
- Amino Acid Tracer PET MRI in Glioma Management: What a Neuroradiologist Needs to Know.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Review
- Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- The Use ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- PET imaging in patients with brain metastasis-report of the RANO/PET group.Neuro-oncology · 2019Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of [Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Paediatric gliomas: diagnosis, molecular biology and management.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for evaluation of brain metastasis recurrence after radiotherapy: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.Neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Neuro-oncology: Amino acid PET for brain tumours - ready for the clinic?Nature reviews. Neurology · 2016Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in tumours other than lung cancer: A systematic review.World journal of radiology · 2014Article
- Cost-effectiveness of (99m)Tc-MIBI in the evaluation of thyroid nodules for malignancy: a new lease of life for an old radiopharmaceutical?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014Article
- Current status of PET imaging in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSeveral diagnostic trials have indicated that the combined use of (18)F-fluoroethyl-L: -tyrosine (FET) PET and MRI may be superior to MRI alone in selecting the biopsy site for the diagnosis of gliomas. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of the use of amino acid PET compared to MRI alone from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance.
methodsTo evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the use of amino acid PET, a decision tree model was built. The effectiveness of FET PET was determined by the probability of a correct diagnosis. Costs were estimated for a baseline scenario and for a more expensive scenario in which disease severity was considered. The robustness of the results was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
resultsThe combined use of PET and MRI resulted in an increase of 18.5% in the likelihood of a correct diagnosis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for one additional correct diagnosis using FET PET was €6,405 for the baseline scenario and €9,114 for the scenario based on higher disease severity. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results.
conclusionThe model indicates that the use of amino acid PET may be cost-effective in patients with glioma. As a result of several limitations in the data used for the model, further studies are needed to confirm the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22419257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.