Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22418825›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2013

[Rescue time and survival of severely injured patients in Germany].

C Kleber, R Lefering, A J Kleber, C T Buschmann, H J Bail, K D Schaser, N P Haas, DGU TraumaRegister

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Independence of the mortality of severely injured patients from types of transport and hospital level in a well-developed trauma network.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Severe thoracic trauma - still an independent predictor for death in multiple injured patients?Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C KleberCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin. christian.kleber@charite.de
R Lefering
A J Kleber
C T Buschmann
H J Bail
K D Schaser
N P Haas
DGU TraumaRegister
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndependent of the rescue system type, a rescue time of less than 60 min for trauma patients is usually required and considered to be crucial for the outcome. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of the rescue time on hospital survival in severely injured patients.

methodsWith the help of the German Trauma Registry of the DGU, the population and rescue time were systematically analyzed with regard to the survival rate. A lower mortality rate was observed with a higher injury severity in metropolitan cities compared to small towns.

resultsA multivariate regression analysis revealed no clinically relevant impact of the rescue time length in the German rescue system on survival. This can be explained by a higher amount of preclinical medical procedures during longer rescue times.

conclusionsWithin the German rescue system, the length of rescue time has no relevant impact on the survival of trauma patients admitted to a clinic. This could be explained by the higher numbers of preclinical measures and due to the limitations of a register study with selection bias. Therefore, we advocate that the necessary and suitable preclinical medical procedures be performed to stabilize the patient, even in cases that have exceeded the 60-min gold standard time window. In conclusion the "golden hour" concept today might better be interpreted as an individual and appropriate "golden period" of trauma.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityRegistriesAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMalePatient AdmissionPrevalenceRescue WorkRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateTransportation of PatientsWaiting ListsWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID22418825
OpenAlexW135330490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.