Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22418619›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2012

Body composition in infants: evidence for developmental programming and techniques for measurement.

Jonathan C K Wells

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Body composition from birth to 2 years.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Maternal Socioeconomic Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Neonatal Anthropometry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Body composition of term healthy Indian newborns.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan C K WellsChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London WC1N 1EH, UK. Jonathan.Wells@ucl.ac.uk
Institute of Child Health · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consequences of fetal growth retardation remain unclear, in part because they appear to vary between industrialized and developing countries. Data on body composition offer a new opportunity to investigate this issue, and may be of particular value in addressing the controversial role of nutrition in infancy, which has been proposed by some to boost survival, and by others to increase long-term risk of chronic diseases. The uncertainty regarding the effects of post-natal nutrition is presenting challenges to nutritional policy as many countries undergo the nutrition transition, whereby the nutritional status of individuals may shift within the life-course. A theoretical model, building on the thrifty phenotype hypothesis, is presented to clarify how body composition data can address this dilemma. Measurements of body composition can now be obtained in infants and children using several different technologies, indicating that large-scale studies can now be conducted to investigate objectively the association between early growth patterns and later health.

Indexed as

InfantAbsorptiometry, PhotonAnthropometryBirth WeightBody CompositionElectric ImpedanceFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal Growth RetardationHealth StatusHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingPlethysmographyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID22418619
OpenAlexW2065212498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.