Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22418039›Full record

SynthesisJournal of lower genital tract disease2012

American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Debbie Saslow, Diane Solomon, Herschel W Lawson, Maureen Killackey, Shalini L Kulasingam, Joanna M Cain, Francisco A R Garcia, Ann T Moriarty, Alan G Waxman, David C Wilbur and 15 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of lower genital tract disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative Oncologic Outcomes in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive and -Negative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Debbie SaslowBreast and Gynecologic Cancer, Cancer Control Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. debbie.saslow@cancer.org
Diane Solomon
Herschel W Lawson
Maureen Killackey
Shalini L Kulasingam
Joanna M Cain
Francisco A R Garcia
Ann T Moriarty
Alan G Waxman
David C Wilbur
Nicolas Wentzensen
Levi S Downs
Mark Spitzer
Anna-Barbara Moscicki
Eduardo L Franco
Mark H Stoler
Mark Schiffman
Philip E Castle
Evan R Myers
David Chelmow
Abbe Herzig
Jane J Kim
Walter Kinney
W Lawson Herschel
Jeffrey Waldman

Funding

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Natural History, Genomics and Risk AssessmentZIACP010206 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHIFFMAN, MARK · 2010 to 2025
$17.1M
Natural History of HPV Infection to NeoplasiaR37CA051323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOSCICKI, ANNA-BARBARA · 2005 to 2014
$15.4M
NATURAL HISTORY OF HPV IN TEENS--INFECTION TO NEOPLASIAR01CA051323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOSCICKI, ANNA-BARBARA NONE · 1990 to 2004
$6.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS R37 CA051323NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from six working groups, and a recent symposium co-sponsored by the ACS, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age-appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow-up (e.g., management of screen positives and screening interval for screen negatives) of women after screening, age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16/18 infections.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAge FactorsAmerican Cancer SocietyBiopsy, NeedleColposcopyCytodiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus Infections

Identifiers

PMID22418039
PMCPMC3915715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.