Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22416052›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2012

Receptor conformations involved in dopamine D(2L) receptor functional selectivity induced by selected transmembrane-5 serine mutations.

J Corey Fowler, Supriyo Bhattacharya, Jonathan D Urban, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Richard B Mailman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Allosteric modulation of dopamine DPharmacological reports : PR · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional Selectivity of Dopamine DInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Dopamine DInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Preferential Coupling of Dopamine DInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Corey FowlerDivision of Medicinal Chemistry and Toxicology Curriculum, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Supriyo Bhattacharya
Jonathan D Urban
Nagarajan Vaidehi
Richard B Mailman
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Screening CoreU19MH082441 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARON, MARC G., JIN, JIAN · 2007 to 2016
$15.2M
NOVEL MOLECULAR SITE FOR ANTIDOPAMINERGIC EFFECTSR01MH040537 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAILMAN, RICHARD B · 1985 to 2001
$506k
NIMH NIH HHS MH040537NIMH NIH HHS MH082441NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH040537NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH082441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although functional selectivity is now widely accepted, the molecular basis is poorly understood. We have studied how aspects of transmembrane region 5 (TM5) of the dopamine D(2L) receptor interacts with three rationally selected rigid ligands (dihydrexidine, dinapsoline, and dinoxyline) and the reference compounds dopamine and quinpirole. As was expected from homology modeling, mutation of three TM5 serine residues to alanine (S5.42A, S5.43A, S5.46A) had little effect on antagonist affinity. All three mutations decreased the affinity of the agonist ligands to different degrees, S5.46A being somewhat less affected. Four functions [adenylate cyclase (AC), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation (MAPK), arachidonic acid release (AA), and guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding (GTPγS)] were assessed. The intrinsic activity (IA) of quinpirole was unaffected by any of the mutations, whereas S5.42A and S5.46A mutations abolished the activity of dopamine and the three rigid ligands, although dihydrexidine retained IA at MAPK function only with S5.42A. Remarkably, S5.43A did not markedly affect IA for AC and MAPK for any of the ligands and eliminated AA activity for dinapsoline and dihydrexidine but not dinoxyline. These data suggest that this mutation did not disrupt the overall conformation or signaling ability of the mutant receptors but differentially affected ligand activation. Computational studies indicate that these D(2) agonists stabilize multiple receptor conformations. This has led to models showing the stabilized conformations and interhelical and receptor-ligand contacts corresponding to the different activation pathways stabilized by various agonists. These data provide a basis for understanding D(2L) functional selectivity and rationally discovering functionally selective D(2) drugs.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)LigandsProtein ConformationRadioligand AssayReceptors, Dopamine D2Serinedopamine D2L receptorGuanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate)LigandsReceptors, Dopamine D2Serine

Identifiers

PMID22416052
PMCPMC3362898
OpenAlexW2098682629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.