Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22415832›Full record

ArticleNature communications2012

Fast and ultrasensitive method for quantitating prion infectivity titre.

Natallia Makarava, Regina Savtchenko, Irina Alexeeva, Robert G Rohwer, Ilia V Baskakov

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sialylation Controls Prion FateThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  16. Methods of Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natallia MakaravaCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Technology, University of Maryland, 725 W. Lombard Street, Baltimore 21201, USA.
Regina Savtchenko
Irina Alexeeva
Robert G Rohwer
Ilia V Baskakov
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USVA Maryland Health Care System · US

Funding

Self-Propagating Mechanism of Prion DiseasesR01NS045585 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI Ilia V Baskakov · 2003 to 2026
$9.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS045585NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioassay by end-point dilution has been used for decades for routine determination of prion infectivity titre. Here we show that the new protein misfolding cyclic amplification with beads (PMCAb) technique can be used to estimate titres of the infection-specific forms of the prion protein with a higher level of precision and in 3-6 days as opposed to 2 years, when compared with the bioassay. For two hamster strains, 263 K and SSLOW, the median reactive doses determined by PCMAb (PMCAb(50)) were found to be 10(12.8) and 10(12.2) per gram of brain tissue, which are 160- and 4,000-fold higher than the corresponding median infectious dose (ID(50)) values measured by bioassay. The 10(2)- to 10(3)-fold differences between ID(50) and PMCAb(50) values could be due to a large excess of PMCAb-reactive prion protein seeds with little or no infectivity. Alternatively, the differences between ID(50) and PMCAb(50) could be due to higher rate of clearance of infection-specific prion protein seeds in animals versus PMCAb reactions. A well-calibrated PMCAb reaction can be an efficient and cost-effective method for the estimation of infection-specific prion protein titre.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesAnimalsBiological AssayCricetinaePrion DiseasesProtein FoldingPrPSc ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityPrPSc Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22415832
PMCPMC3518416
OpenAlexW2015236311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.