ArticleUrological research2012
Comparison of conventional radiography combined with ultrasonography versus nonenhanced helical computed tomography in evaluation of patients with renal colic.
Article in Urological research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus.Annals of emergency medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Could flank pain be an indicator of COVID-19 infection?Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2020Article
- Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography.Arab journal of urology · 2016Article
- Techniques for Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Evaluation, Surgical Treatment, and Follow-up of Urinary Lithiasis.Current urology reports · 2015Review
- Correlation of volume, position of stone, and hydronephrosis with microhematuria in patients with solitary urolithiasis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2013Article
- Office ultrasound for the urologist.Current urology reports · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine whether kidneys ureters bladder X-ray (KUB) film combined with ultrasound (US) can be effectively used in evaluation of renal colic and miss stones with clinically significant size identified on nonenhanced computed tomography (NECT) in patients with urolithiasis. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical and radiological records of 300 patients at our institution undergoing KUB and/or US and/or NECT for the evaluation of renal colic from June 2007 to December 2010. Of patients with negative findings on KUB and/or US, 22 had renal stones on NECT (mean size 4.4 mm, range 3-8), 3 had lower ureteral stone (mean size 3.3 mm, range 2-5). In patients with isolated suspicious renal ectasia without stone image, two had renal stone on NECT (mean size 4 mm, range 2-6), 5 had upper ureteral stone (mean size 4.4 mm, range 4-6), 7 had middle ureteral stone (mean size 3.7 mm, range 3-4) and 14 had lower ureteral stone (mean size 4 mm, range 2-6). The cost-effective and almost radiation-free combination of KUB and US should be preferred for diagnosis of urolithiasis, as it detects most of the ureteral and renal calculi which are clinically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.