Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22414922›Full record

ArticleAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)

CAGE, RAPS4, RAPS4-QF and AUDIT screening tests for men and women admitted for acute alcohol intoxication to an emergency department: are standard thresholds appropriate?

J Geneste, B Pereira, B Arnaud, N Christol, J Liotier, O Blanc, F Teissedre, S Hope, R Schwan, P M Llorca and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A research agenda for gender and substance use disorders in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

J GenesteCHU Clermont Ferrand, Urgences Adultes, France.
B Pereira
B Arnaud
N Christol
J Liotier
O Blanc
F Teissedre
S Hope
R Schwan
P M Llorca
J Schmidt
C J Cherpitel
L Malet
G Brousse
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRAlcohol Research Group · USGenetique Reproduction and Developpement · FRHôpital Jeanne d'Arc · FRLaboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive · FRRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GB

Funding

Cross-National Analysis of Alcohol & InjuryR01AA013750 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI CHERPITEL, CHERYL J · 2002 to 2018
$4.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 2 AA013750-04NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA number of screening instruments are routinely used in Emergency Department (ED) situations to identify alcohol-use disorders (AUD). We wished to study the psychometric features, particularly concerning optimal thresholds scores (TSs), of four assessment scales frequently used to screen for abuse and/or dependence, the cut-down annoyed guilty eye-opener (CAGE), Rapid Alcohol Problem Screen 4 (RAPS4), RAPS4-quantity-frequency and AUD Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaires, particularly in the sub-group of people admitted for acute alcohol intoxication (AAI).

methodsAll included patients [AAI admitted to ED (blood alcohol level ≥0.8 g/l)] were assessed by the four scales, and with a gold standard (alcohol dependence/abuse section of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), to determine AUD status. To investigate the TSs of the scales, we used Youden's index, efficiency, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve techniques and quality ROC curve technique for optimized TS (indices of quality).

resultsA total of 164 persons (122 males, 42 females) were included in the study. Nineteen (11.60%) were identified as alcohol abusers alone and 128 (78.1%) as alcohol dependents (DSM-IV). Results suggest a statistically significant difference between men and women (P < 0.05) in performance of the screening tests RAPS4 (≥1) and CAGE (≥2) for detecting abuse. Also, in this population, we show an increase in TSs of RAPS4 (≥2) and CAGE (≥3) for detecting dependence compared with those typically accepted in non-intoxicated individuals. The AUDIT test demonstrates good performance for detecting alcohol abuse and/or alcohol-dependent patients (≥7 for women and ≥12 for men) and for distinguishing alcohol dependence (≥11 for women and ≥14 for men) from other conditions.

conclusionOur study underscores for the first time the need to adapt, taking into account gender, the thresholds of tests typically used for detection of abuse and dependence in this population.

Indexed as

Alcoholic IntoxicationAdultAlcoholismEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPsychometricsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22414922
PMCPMC3331621
OpenAlexW2117964729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.