Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22414883›Full record

ReviewSeminars in perinatology2012

Patent ductus arteriosus: are current neonatal treatment options better or worse than no treatment at all?

Ronald I Clyman, James Couto, Gail M Murphy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A pilot randomised blinded placebo-controlled trial of paracetamol for later treatment of a patent ductus arteriosus.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Current practices in the management of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald I ClymanDepartment of Pediatrics, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. clymanr@peds.ucsf.edu
James Couto
Gail M Murphy
American Academy of Pediatrics · USCenter for Assessment · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

VESSEL REMODELING DURING FETAL DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS CLOSURER01HL046691 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CLYMAN, RONALD I · 1992 to 2010
$3.9M
Genes contributing to patent ductus arteriosus susceptibility in preterm newbornsR01HL109199 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CLYMAN, RONALD I · 2011 to 2014
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL109199NHLBI NIH HHS HL46691NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL046691NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a moderate-sized patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) needs to be closed by the time a child is 1-2 years old, there is great uncertainty about whether it needs to be closed during the neonatal period. Although 95% of neonatologists believe that a moderate-sized PDA should be closed if it persists in infants (born before 28 weeks) who still require mechanical ventilation, the number of neonatologists who treat a PDA when it occurs in infants who do not require mechanical ventilation varies widely. Both the high likelihood of spontaneous ductus closure and the absence of randomized controlled trials, specifically addressing the risks and benefits of neonatal ductus closure, add to the current uncertainty. New information suggests that early pharmacologic treatment has several important short-term benefits for the preterm newborn. By contrast, ductus ligation, while eliminating the detrimental effects of a PDA on lung development, may create its own set of morbidities that counteract many of the benefits derived from ductus closure.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsDuctus Arteriosus, PatentFemaleHumansIndomethacinInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesLigationMalePregnancyRespiration, ArtificialUnnecessary ProceduresCardiovascular AgentsIndomethacin

Identifiers

PMID22414883
PMCPMC3305915
OpenAlexW2106221367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.