Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22414427›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2012

The evolution of filamin-a protein domain repeat perspective.

Sara Light, Rauan Sagit, Sujay S Ithychanda, Jun Qin, Arne Elofsson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improved inference of tandem domain duplications.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A novel structural unit in the N-terminal region of filamins.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara LightCenter for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Life Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-17121 Solna, Sweden.
Rauan Sagit
Sujay S Ithychanda
Jun Qin
Arne Elofsson
Science for Life Laboratory · SECleveland Clinic · US

Funding

NMR Structural Elucidation of Integrin ActivationR01GM062823 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI QIN, JUN · 2002 to 2018
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062823NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM62823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particularly in higher eukaryotes, some protein domains are found in tandem repeats, performing broad functions often related to cellular organization. For instance, the eukaryotic protein filamin interacts with many proteins and is crucial for the cytoskeleton. The functional properties of long repeat domains are governed by the specific properties of each individual domain as well as by the repeat copy number. To provide better understanding of the evolutionary and functional history of repeating domains, we investigated the mode of evolution of the filamin domain in some detail. Among the domains that are common in long repeat proteins, sushi and spectrin domains evolve primarily through cassette tandem duplications while scavenger and immunoglobulin repeats appear to evolve through clustered tandem duplications. Additionally, immunoglobulin and filamin repeats exhibit a unique pattern where every other domain shows high sequence similarity. This pattern may be the result of tandem duplications, serve to avert aggregation between adjacent domains or it is the result of functional constraints. In filamin, our studies confirm the presence of interspersed integrin binding domains in vertebrates, while invertebrates exhibit more varied patterns, including more clustered integrin binding domains. The most notable case is leech filamin, which contains a 20 repeat expansion and exhibits unique dimerization topology. Clearly, invertebrate filamins are varied and contain examples of similar adjacent integrin-binding domains. Given that invertebrate integrin shows more similarity to the weaker filamin binder, integrin β3, it is possible that the distance between integrin-binding domains is not as crucial for invertebrate filamins as for vertebrates.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCluster AnalysisConsensus SequenceContractile ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFilaminsHumansMarkov ChainsMicrofilament ProteinsModels, GeneticModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsContractile ProteinsFilaminsMicrofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22414427
PMCPMC3728663
OpenAlexW2163096438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.