Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22414200›Full record

Trial reportHealth and quality of life outcomes2012

Measurement equivalence of the SF-36 in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Lisa M Lix, Beliz Acan Osman, Jonathan D Adachi, Tanveer Towheed, Wilma Hopman, K Shawn Davison, William D Leslie

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Race Differences in Patient-Reported Symptoms during Chemotherapy among Women with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Assessing measurement invariance of MSQOL-54 across Italian and English versions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: data from the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M LixSchool of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. lisa.lix@usask.ca
Beliz Acan Osman
Jonathan D Adachi
Tanveer Towheed
Wilma Hopman
K Shawn Davison
William D Leslie
Queen's University · CAMcMaster University · CASaskatchewan Health Authority · CASaskatchewan Health Quality Council · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies that compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and other patient-reported outcomes in different populations rest on the assumption that the measure has equivalent psychometric properties across groups. This study examined the measurement equivalence (ME) of the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey (SF-36), a widely-used measure of HRQOL, by sex and race in a population-based Canadian sample.

findingsSF-36 data were from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, a prospective cohort study that randomly sampled adult men and women from nine sites across Canada. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques were used to test hypotheses about four forms of ME, which are based on equality of the factor loadings, variances, covariances, and intercepts. Analyses were conducted for Caucasian and non-Caucasian females (n = 6,539) and males (n = 2,884). CFA results revealed that a measurement model with physical and mental health factors provided a good fit to the data. All forms of ME were satisfied for the study groups.

conclusionsThe results suggest that sex and race do not influence the conceptualization of a general measure of HRQOL in the Canadian population.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsQuality of LifeAdultAgedAge FactorsCanadaCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFractures, SpontaneousHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID22414200
PMCPMC3325165
OpenAlexW2148423123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.