Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22412903›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Amplified genes may be overexpressed, unchanged, or downregulated in cervical cancer cell lines.

Oscar Vazquez-Mena, Ingrid Medina-Martinez, Eligia Juárez-Torres, Valeria Barrón, Ana Espinosa, Nicolás Villegas-Sepulveda, Laura Gómez-Laguna, Karem Nieto-Martínez, Lorena Orozco, Edgar Roman-Basaure and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aberrant methylation-mediated downregulation of lncRNAJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar Vazquez-MenaUnidad de Medicina Genómica, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital General de México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, Distrito Federal, México.
Ingrid Medina-Martinez
Eligia Juárez-Torres
Valeria Barrón
Ana Espinosa
Nicolás Villegas-Sepulveda
Laura Gómez-Laguna
Karem Nieto-Martínez
Lorena Orozco
Edgar Roman-Basaure
Sergio Muñoz Cortez
Manuel Borges Ibañez
Carlos Venegas-Vega
Mariano Guardado-Estrada
Angélica Rangel-López
Susana Kofman
Jaime Berumen
Hospital General de México · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXInstituto de Medicina Genómica · ESInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several copy number-altered regions (CNAs) have been identified in the genome of cervical cancer, notably, amplifications of 3q and 5p. However, the contribution of copy-number alterations to cervical carcinogenesis is unresolved because genome-wide there exists a lack of correlation between copy-number alterations and gene expression. In this study, we investigated whether CNAs in the cell lines CaLo, CaSki, HeLa, and SiHa were associated with changes in gene expression. On average, 19.2% of the cell-line genomes had CNAs. However, only 2.4% comprised minimal recurrent regions (MRRs) common to all the cell lines. Whereas 3q had limited common gains (13%), 5p was entirely duplicated recurrently. Genome-wide, only 15.6% of genes located in CNAs changed gene expression; in contrast, the rate in MRRs was up to 3 times this. Chr 5p was confirmed entirely amplified by FISH; however, maximum 33.5% of the explored genes in 5p were deregulated. In 3q, this rate was 13.4%. Even in 3q26, which had 5 MRRs and 38.7% recurrently gained SNPs, the rate was only 15.1%. Interestingly, up to 19% of deregulated genes in 5p and 73% in 3q26 were downregulated, suggesting additional factors were involved in gene repression. The deregulated genes in 3q and 5p occurred in clusters, suggesting local chromatin factors may also influence gene expression. In regions amplified discontinuously, downregulated genes increased steadily as the number of amplified SNPs increased (p<0.01, Spearman's correlation). Therefore, partial gene amplification may function in silencing gene expression. Additional genes in 1q, 3q and 5p could be involved in cervical carcinogenesis, specifically in apoptosis. These include PARP1 in 1q, TNFSF10 and ECT2 in 3q and CLPTM1L, AHRR, PDCD6, and DAP in 5p. Overall, gene expression and copy-number profiles reveal factors other than gene dosage, like epigenetic or chromatin domains, may influence gene expression within the entirely amplified genome segments.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCell LineChromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSignal TransductionUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22412903
PMCPMC3296745
OpenAlexW2056692626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.