ArticlePLoS genetics2012
A machine learning approach for identifying novel cell type-specific transcriptional regulators of myogenesis.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- SEAMoD: A fully interpretable neural network for cis-regulatory analysis of differentially expressed genes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Improved recovery of cell-cycle gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae from regulatory interactions in multiple omics data.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Article
- A new method for enhancer prediction based on deep belief network.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Prediction and validation of protein-protein interactors from genome-wide DNA-binding data using a knowledge-based machine-learning approach.Open biology · 2016Article
- Cis-regulatory architecture of a brain signaling center predates the origin of chordates.Nature genetics · 2016Article
- Two Forkhead transcription factors regulate cardiac progenitor specification by controlling the expression of receptors of the fibroblast growth factor and Wnt signaling pathways.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2016Article
- Quantitative multivariate analysis of dynamic multicellular morphogenic trajectories.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015Article
- The myogenic repressor gene Holes in muscles is a direct transcriptional target of Twist and Tinman in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm.Developmental biology · 2015Article
- Muscle cell fate choice requires the T-box transcription factor midline in Drosophila.Genetics · 2015Article
- Extrapolating histone marks across developmental stages, tissues, and species: an enhancer prediction case study.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Enhancer modeling uncovers transcriptional signatures of individual cardiac cell states in Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Article
- High resolution mapping of enhancer-promoter interactions.PloS one · 2015Article
- Imogene: identification of motifs and cis-regulatory modules underlying gene co-regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Integrating diverse datasets improves developmental enhancer prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Genome-wide analysis of functional and evolutionary features of tele-enhancers.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2014Article
- Machine learning classification of cell-specific cardiac enhancers uncovers developmental subnetworks regulating progenitor cell division and cell fate specification.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2014Article
- High-resolution genome-wide DNA methylation maps of mouse primary female dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2014Article
- Highly parallel assays of tissue-specific enhancers in whole Drosophila embryos.Nature methods · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptional enhancers integrate the contributions of multiple classes of transcription factors (TFs) to orchestrate the myriad spatio-temporal gene expression programs that occur during development. A molecular understanding of enhancers with similar activities requires the identification of both their unique and their shared sequence features. To address this problem, we combined phylogenetic profiling with a DNA-based enhancer sequence classifier that analyzes the TF binding sites (TFBSs) governing the transcription of a co-expressed gene set. We first assembled a small number of enhancers that are active in Drosophila melanogaster muscle founder cells (FCs) and other mesodermal cell types. Using phylogenetic profiling, we increased the number of enhancers by incorporating orthologous but divergent sequences from other Drosophila species. Functional assays revealed that the diverged enhancer orthologs were active in largely similar patterns as their D. melanogaster counterparts, although there was extensive evolutionary shuffling of known TFBSs. We then built and trained a classifier using this enhancer set and identified additional related enhancers based on the presence or absence of known and putative TFBSs. Predicted FC enhancers were over-represented in proximity to known FC genes; and many of the TFBSs learned by the classifier were found to be critical for enhancer activity, including POU homeodomain, Myb, Ets, Forkhead, and T-box motifs. Empirical testing also revealed that the T-box TF encoded by org-1 is a previously uncharacterized regulator of muscle cell identity. Finally, we found extensive diversity in the composition of TFBSs within known FC enhancers, suggesting that motif combinatorics plays an essential role in the cellular specificity exhibited by such enhancers. In summary, machine learning combined with evolutionary sequence analysis is useful for recognizing novel TFBSs and for facilitating the identification of cognate TFs that coordinate cell type-specific developmental gene expression patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.