Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22411982›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2012

Chaperone-usher pathways: diversity and pilus assembly mechanism.

Andreas Busch, Gabriel Waksman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A cold-responsiveApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Anti-infective compounds forSustainable microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The role of uropathogenicJournal of medicine and life · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Combinatorial control ofmSystems · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Bioinformatics and immunoinformatics assisted multiepitope vaccine construct againstSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Shiga-Toxin-Producing Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Bacterial biofilms in the human body: prevalence and impacts on health and disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas BuschInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Malet Street, WC1E 7HX London, UK.
Gabriel Waksman

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800002Wellcome Trust 082227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to eight different types of secretion systems, and several more subtypes, have been described in Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we focus on the diversity and assembly mechanism of one of the best-studied secretion systems, the widespread chaperone-usher pathway known to assemble and secrete adhesive surface structures, called pili or fimbriae, which play essential roles in targeting bacterial pathogens to the host.

Indexed as

Bacterial Secretion SystemsAdhesins, Escherichia coliFimbriae, BacterialFimbriae ProteinsGenetic Complementation TestGenetic VariationGram-Negative BacteriaHost-Pathogen InteractionsMolecular ChaperonesMultigene FamilyMultiprotein ComplexesProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, ImmunologicAdhesins, Escherichia colibacterial adhesin receptorBacterial Secretion SystemsFimbriae ProteinsfimD protein, bacteriafimH protein, E coliMolecular ChaperonesMultiprotein ComplexesReceptors, Immunologic

Identifiers

PMID22411982
PMCPMC3297437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.