Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22411089›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2012

Double omental flap reduced perianastomotic collections and relaparotomy rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Edoardo Rosso, Patricia Lopez, Marie Noel Roedlisch, Masato Narita, Elie Oussoultzoglou, Philippe Bachellier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  8. Pancreatoduodenectomy - preventing complications.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edoardo RossoCentre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg, CHU Hautepierre, Avenue Molière, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Patricia Lopez
Marie Noel Roedlisch
Masato Narita
Elie Oussoultzoglou
Philippe Bachellier
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn an attempt to reduce the perioperative morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy, the results of double omental flap (DOF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) were compared to a standard technique.

methodsFrom January 2009 to December 2009, 61 patients underwent PD with PG for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in our department. Perioperative data were prospectively recorded, and postoperative outcome of patients who underwent or not a DOF (group DOF+ = 33 and group DOF- = 28, respectively) was analyzed.

resultsThe overall postoperative mortality was 1.6 % (n = 1). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 27.8 % (n = 17). PF occurred in eight (13.1 %) patients and was grade A in six (9.8 %) patients. Clinically relevant PF (grade B and C) occurred in two (3.2 %) patients. The univariate analysis showed that in the DOF+ groups there was a significant reduction of perianastomotic collections (P = 0.034) and a significant reduction of the relaparotomy rate (P = 0.05). DISCUSSION: The DOF contributed to reduce the rate of perianastomotic collections as well as the rate of relaparotomy.

conclusionsA DOF should be considered a further step toward a reduction of surgical-related complications after PD with PG.

Indexed as

Surgical FlapsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakFemaleGastrostomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmentumPancreasPancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID22411089
OpenAlexW2140882461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.