Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22410833›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2012

Clinical outcome of rectal cancer in patients ≥ 80 years treated in southern France (PACA region) between 2002 and 2005.

O Guerin, J Gal, E Francois, B Jacqueme, V Sciortino, J P Gerard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

O GuerinPôle de Gérontologie - CHU Nice, Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
J Gal
E Francois
B Jacqueme
V Sciortino
J P Gerard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal cancer in patients aged ≥ 80 years is increasingly more frequent. Little is known regarding their clinical history and outcome after treatment. This retrospective study was undertaken to provide data on this situation. MATERIAL AND

methodA questionnaire was sent to the medical doctors of 414 patients listed in the database of Régime Général of Sécurité Sociale, living in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (PACA) region between 2002 and 2005, aged ≥ 80 years, and registered as having rectal cancer. Survival was analyzed and correlated with patients' and treatment characteristics.

resultsValidated questionnaire was available for 78 patients representing close to 20% of the PACA-targeted population. The majority of patients presented a T3 tumor treated with surgery (61 cases). Median follow-up for the 78 patients was 42 months and the 5-year overall survival was 51%. In the multivariate analysis, the main prognostic factors were gender (better survival in women), age ≤ 85 years, and most of all performance of surgery.

conclusionRectal cancer for patients between 79 and 85 years does not differ much from that in younger patients and can be treated in a similar manner--depending on the patient's general condition. In patients > 85 years, it is advisable to reduce surgical trauma as much as possible.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overFemaleFranceHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.