Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22410181›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2011

Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Glenis Scadding, Peter Hellings, Isam Alobid, Claus Bachert, Wytske Fokkens, Roy Gerth van Wijk, Philippe Gevaert, Josep Guilemany, Livije Kalogjera, Valerie Lund and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Temporal trends of blood eosinophilia in severe uncontrolled CRSwNP treated with dupilumab: a real-life study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Glenis ScaddingRoyal National Throat, Nose and Ear Institute, London, UK. gscadding@gmail.com.
Peter Hellings
Isam Alobid
Claus Bachert
Wytske Fokkens
Roy Gerth van Wijk
Philippe Gevaert
Josep Guilemany
Livije Kalogjera
Valerie Lund
Joaquim Mullol
Giovanni Passalacqua
Elina Toskala
Cornelius van Drunen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This EAACI Task Force document aims at providing the readers with a comprehensive and complete overview of the currently available tools for diagnosis of nasal and sino-nasal disease. We have tried to logically order the different important issues related to history taking, clinical examination and additional investigative tools for evaluation of the severity of sinonasal disease into a consensus document. A panel of European experts in the field of Rhinology has contributed to this consensus document on Diagnostic Tools in Rhinology.

Identifiers

PMID22410181
PMCPMC3294630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.