Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22409482›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2012

Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Joe Arthurs, Jian-You Lin, Leslie Renee Amodeo, Steve Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of the gustatory thalamus in taste learning.Behavioural brain research · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joe ArthursDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Jian-You Lin
Leslie Renee Amodeo
Steve Reilly

Funding

Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in CTAR01DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2004 to 2020
$3.9M
Parabrachial-Forebrain Interactions in Conditioned Taste AversionR56DC006456 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2009
$339k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC06456NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006456NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC006456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs of abuse are known to reduce intake of a taste conditioned stimulus (conditional stimulus, CS), a behavioral response sometimes seen as paradoxical because the same drugs also serve as rewards in other behavioral procedures. In the present study we compared patterns of intake and palatability (assessed using microstructural analysis of licking) for a standard saccharin CS paired with the following: lithium chloride, morphine, amphetamine, or sucrose. We found that morphine and amphetamine, like lithium-induced illness, each suppressed CS intake and caused a reduction in saccharin palatability. Sucrose, a rewarding stimulus, did not reduce the palatability of the saccharin CS. We interpret these finds as evidence that drugs of abuse induce conditioned taste aversions.

Indexed as

RewardAmphetamineAnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, PsychologicalFood PreferencesMaleMorphineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySaccharinSucroseTasteAmphetamineMorphineSaccharinSucrose

Identifiers

PMID22409482
PMCPMC3365613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.