Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22408187›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2012

Defining the risk of toxicity in phase I oncology trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: a single centre experience.

L R Molife, S Alam, D Olmos, M Puglisi, K Shah, R Fehrmann, L Trani, A Tjokrowidjaja, J S de Bono, U Banerji and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of age on dose-limiting toxicities in phase I dose-escalation trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer drug development: The missing links.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of the Safety and Benefit of Phase I Oncology Trials for Patients With Primary CNS Tumors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Article
  13. Higher Risk of Infections with PI3K-AKT-mTOR Pathway Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors on Phase I Clinical Trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  14. Nomogram to predict cycle-one serious drug-related toxicity in phase I oncology trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L R MolifeDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. Electronic address: rhoda.molife@icr.ac.uk.
S AlamDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
D OlmosDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
M PuglisiDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
K ShahDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
R FehrmannDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
L TraniDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
A TjokrowidjajaDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
J S de BonoDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
U BanerjiDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
S B KayeDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C51/A6883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study defined the risk of serious toxicity in phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents (MTA). PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of toxicity data from patients treated in phase I trials of MTAs was carried out to define the rate of treatment-related grade 3/4 toxic effects, deaths and risk factors associated with grade 3 or more toxicity.

resultsData from 687 patients [median age, 59.1 years (range 12.5-85.5)] treated in 36 trials were analysed. Two hundred and eleven patients were of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) zero, 432 of PS one, 38 of PS two and 6 unknown. The rate of grade 3 and 4 events was 14.1% (n=97) and 1.9% (n=13), respectively. Twenty-four percent of events were gastrointestinal, 22% constitutional and 20% metabolic. PS two was associated with a higher risk of toxicity [odds ratio (OR), 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.1; P=0.032] as was receiving >100% of maximum tolerated dose or maximum administered dose (OR 2.5; CI 1.6-3.9; P<0.001). Mortality rate was 0.43% (n=3).

conclusionsTherapy with novel MTAs in phase I trials is associated with a moderate risk of significant toxicity. This appears less than in phase I studies involving cytotoxic agents, particularly in relation to grade 4 toxicity. The risk of death is low.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChildClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicHumansMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22408187
OpenAlexW2162774798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.