ArticleAnnals of botany2012
Plant responsiveness to root-root communication of stress cues.
Article in Annals of botany, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do strigolactones play a role in the ascent and attachment behavior ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2025Article
- Integrated above- and below-ground interplant cueing of salt stress.Plant signaling & behavior · 2025Article
- Novel insights into maize (Zea mays) development and organogenesis for agricultural optimization.Planta · 2023Review
- Interspecific Drought Cuing in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genome-wide association study of agronomical and root-related traits in spring barley collection grown under field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Is ABA the exogenous vector of interplant drought cuing?Plant signaling & behavior · 2022Article
- Explaining pre-emptive acclimation by linking information to plant phenotype.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Review
- Deciphering the Genetic Basis of Root and Biomass Traits in Rapeseed (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Extended Plant Metarhizobiome: Understanding Volatile Organic Compound Signaling in Plant-Microbe Metapopulation Networks.mSystems · 2021Article
- Social networking in crop plants: Wired and wireless cross-plant communications.Plant, cell & environment · 2021Review
- Leachates from plants recently infected by root-feeding nematodes cause increased biomass allocation to roots in neighbouring plants.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Root and Shoot Related Traits in Spring Soybean (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Underground electrotonic signal transmission between plants.Communicative & integrative biology · 2020Article
- Root Plasticity in the Pursuit of Water.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Thermal Benefits From White Variegation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Plant neighbor detection and allelochemical response are driven by root-secreted signaling chemicals.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Plant Science View on Biohybrid Development.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017Review
- Root-mediated signal transmission of systemic acquired resistance against above-ground and below-ground pathogens.Annals of botany · 2016Article
- Genetic variants in root architecture-related genes in a Glycine soja accession, a potential resource to improve cultivated soybean.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Say it with flowers: flowering acceleration by root communication.Plant signaling & behavior · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPhenotypic plasticity is based on the organism's ability to perceive, integrate and respond to multiple signals and cues informative of environmental opportunities and perils. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that plants are able to adapt to imminent threats by perceiving cues emitted from their damaged neighbours. Here, the hypothesis was tested that unstressed plants are able to perceive and respond to stress cues emitted from their drought- and osmotically stressed neighbours and to induce stress responses in additional unstressed plants.
methodsSplit-root Pisum sativum, Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria sanguinalis and Stenotaphrum secundatum plants were subjected to osmotic stress or drought while sharing one of their rooting volumes with an unstressed neighbour, which in turn shared its other rooting volume with additional unstressed neighbours. Following the kinetics of stomatal aperture allowed testing for stress responses in both the stressed plants and their unstressed neighbours. KEY
resultsIn both P. sativum plants and the three wild clonal grasses, infliction of osmotic stress or drought caused stomatal closure in both the stressed plants and in their unstressed neighbours. While both continuous osmotic stress and drought induced prolonged stomatal closure and limited acclimation in stressed plants, their unstressed neighbours habituated to the stress cues and opened their stomata 3-24 h after the beginning of stress induction.
conclusionsThe results demonstrate a novel type of plant communication, by which plants might be able to increase their readiness to probable future osmotic and drought stresses. Further work is underway to decipher the identity and mode of operation of the involved communication vectors and to assess the potential ecological costs and benefits of emitting and perceiving drought and osmotic stress cues under various ecological scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.