Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22408186›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2012

Plant responsiveness to root-root communication of stress cues.

Omer Falik, Yonat Mordoch, Daniel Ben-Natan, Miriam Vanunu, Oron Goldstein, Ariel Novoplansky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Interspecific Drought Cuing in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Deciphering the Genetic Basis of Root and Biomass Traits in Rapeseed (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Underground electrotonic signal transmission between plants.Communicative & integrative biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Root Plasticity in the Pursuit of Water.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  15. Thermal Benefits From White Variegation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Plant Science View on Biohybrid Development.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omer FalikMitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion 84990, Israel.
Yonat Mordoch
Daniel Ben-Natan
Miriam Vanunu
Oron Goldstein
Ariel Novoplansky
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPhenotypic plasticity is based on the organism's ability to perceive, integrate and respond to multiple signals and cues informative of environmental opportunities and perils. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that plants are able to adapt to imminent threats by perceiving cues emitted from their damaged neighbours. Here, the hypothesis was tested that unstressed plants are able to perceive and respond to stress cues emitted from their drought- and osmotically stressed neighbours and to induce stress responses in additional unstressed plants.

methodsSplit-root Pisum sativum, Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria sanguinalis and Stenotaphrum secundatum plants were subjected to osmotic stress or drought while sharing one of their rooting volumes with an unstressed neighbour, which in turn shared its other rooting volume with additional unstressed neighbours. Following the kinetics of stomatal aperture allowed testing for stress responses in both the stressed plants and their unstressed neighbours. KEY

resultsIn both P. sativum plants and the three wild clonal grasses, infliction of osmotic stress or drought caused stomatal closure in both the stressed plants and in their unstressed neighbours. While both continuous osmotic stress and drought induced prolonged stomatal closure and limited acclimation in stressed plants, their unstressed neighbours habituated to the stress cues and opened their stomata 3-24 h after the beginning of stress induction.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate a novel type of plant communication, by which plants might be able to increase their readiness to probable future osmotic and drought stresses. Further work is underway to decipher the identity and mode of operation of the involved communication vectors and to assess the potential ecological costs and benefits of emitting and perceiving drought and osmotic stress cues under various ecological scenarios.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCynodonDigitariaDroughtsOsmotic PressurePisum sativumPlant RootsPlant StomataSignal TransductionSodium ChlorideStress, PhysiologicalWaterSodium ChlorideWater

Identifiers

PMID22408186
PMCPMC3394639
OpenAlexW2144985902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.