ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2012
Innovation in biological microscopy: current status and future directions.
Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitive prediction of small-molecule function through alignment of high-content screening resources.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Sex Disparities of the Sacroiliac Joint: Focus on Joint Anatomy and Imaging Appearance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The new era of quantitative cell imaging-challenges and opportunities.Molecular cell · 2022Review
- A global view of standards for open image data formats and repositories.Nature methods · 2021Article
- Visualising an invisible symbiosis.Plants, people, planet · 2021Article
- easyXpress: An R package to analyze and visualize high-throughput C. elegans microscopy data generated using CellProfiler.PloS one · 2021Article
- Current Trends of Microfluidic Single-Cell Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- A beginner's guide to rigor and reproducibility in fluorescence imaging experiments.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018Article
- Following Optogenetic Dimerizers and Quantitative Prospects.Biophysical journal · 2016Review
- Finding new drugs to enhance anion secretion in cystic fibrosis: Toward suitable systems for better drug screening. Report on the pre-conference meeting to the 12th ECFS Basic Science Conference, Albufeira, 25-28 March 2015.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2015Article
- Developing 3D SEM in a broad biological context.Journal of microscopy · 2015Article
- Subcellular localization-dependent changes in EGFP fluorescence lifetime measured by time-resolved flow cytometry.Biomedical optics express · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The current revolution in biological microscopy stems from the realisation that advances in optics and computational tools and automation make the modern microscope an instrument that can access all scales relevant to modern biology - from individual molecules all the way to whole tissues and organisms and from single snapshots to time-lapse recordings sampling from milliseconds to days. As these and more new technologies appear, the challenges of delivering them to the community grows as well. I discuss some of these challenges, and the examples where openly shared technology have made an impact on the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.