Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22407522›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2012

The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels.

Anna K Blakney, Mark D Swartzlander, Stephanie J Bryant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 222 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
222citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

222 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 459 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. PIEZO1 in Immune Cells: From Force to Function.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Research Progress on Biomaterials with Immunomodulatory Effects in Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Macrophage Polarization Profiling in Dynamic Culture System.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna K BlakneyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Mark D Swartzlander
Stephanie J Bryant
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Mechanical Stimulation of Cells in Photopolymerized GelsK22DE016608 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BRYANT, STEPHANIE J · 2005 to 2009
$552k
Modulating the Host Response to Tissue Engineering ScaffoldsR03DE019505 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYANT, STEPHANIE J · 2010 to 2011
$231k
NIDCR NIH HHS 1R03DE019505NIDCR NIH HHS K22 DE016608NIDCR NIH HHS K22DE016608NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE019505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels, modified with RGD, are promising platforms for cell encapsulation and tissue engineering. While these hydrogels offer tunable mechanical properties, the extent of the host response may limit their in vivo applicability. The overall objective was to characterize the effects of hydrogel stiffness on the in vitro macrophage response and in vivo host response. We hypothesized that stiffer substrates induce better attachment, adhesion, and increased cell spreading, which elevates the macrophage classically activated phenotype and leads to a more severe foreign body reaction (FBR). PEG-RGD hydrogels were fabricated with compressive moduli of 130, 240, and 840 kPa, and the same RGD concentration. Hydrogel stiffness did not impact macrophage attachment, but elicited differences in cell morphology. Cells retained a round morphology on 130 kPa substrates, with localized and dense F-actin and localized α(V) integrin stainings. Contrarily, cells on stiffer substrates were more spread, with filopodia protruding from the cell, a more defined F-actin, and greater α(V) integrin staining. When stimulated with lipopolysaccharide, macrophages had a classical activation phenotype, with increased expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, however the degree of activation was significantly reduced with the softest hydrogels. A FBR ensued in response to all hydrogels when implanted subcutaneously in mice, but 28 days postimplantation the layer of macrophages at the implant surface was significantly lower in the softest hydrogels. In conclusion, hydrogels with lower stiffness led to reduced macrophage activation and a less severe and more typical FBR, and therefore are more suited for in vivo tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsAwards and PrizesBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell LineGene Expression RegulationHydrogelsInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6LipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMaleMechanical PhenomenaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOligopeptidesarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsInterleukin-1betainterleukin-1beta (163-171)Interleukin-6LipopolysaccharidesOligopeptidesPeptide FragmentsPolyethylene GlycolsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID22407522
PMCPMC3339197
OpenAlexW1489759013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.