ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2012
Stroke treatment using intravenous and intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Adult stem cell transplantation: is gender a factor in stemness?International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- Matrix metalloproteinases and blood-brain barrier disruption in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementAcute ischemic stroke is the most common cause of adult disability in the world and the third most common cause of death. Early restoration of perfusion to ischemic brain has been a highly successful strategy to decrease the disability associated with acute ischemic stroke. For acute stroke, intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is the only proven acute treatment that results in improved clinical outcomes. IV t-PA is indicated for ischemic stroke when administered within 4.5 h or less of symptom onset. This 4.5-hour treatment window represents a significant expansion from the previous 3-hour treatment window for therapy. Despite a longer time window, patients have the greatest chance for an improved outcome when treatment occurs as soon as possible from the time of symptom onset. The Emergency Department goal for treatment is a door to t-PA administration time of 60 min. In order to facilitate rapid evaluation and treatment, systems of care that streamline treatment should be developed at every institution that cares for acute ischemic stroke patients. For those with contraindications to t-PA and those outside the treatment window, catheter-directed intra-arterial (IA) t-PA administration or mechanical clot extraction is a potential means of restoring brain perfusion. These therapies should not preclude the use of IV t-PA when feasible and are frequently only available at tertiary care centers. Technological advances in IA devices for mechanical clot extraction make this a promising and growing area for advancing stroke therapy but remain under ongoing investigation to establish improved clinical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.