Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22407271›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2012

Basic fibroblast growth factor in an animal model of spontaneous mammary tumor progression.

Steven Kao, Jeffrey Mo, Andrew Baird, Brian P Eliceiri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The FGF/FGFR axis as a therapeutic target in breast cancer.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven KaoDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, MC 8236, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Jeffrey Mo
Andrew Baird
Brian P Eliceiri
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

A Combinatorial Approach to Wound Healing for Protein, Gene and Cell TherapeuticsP20GM078421 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAIRD, ANDREW · 2006 to 2009
$3.4M
Vascular mechanisms regulating breast cancer brain metastasisR01CA170140 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELICEIRI, BRIAN P, FELDING, BRUNIE H. · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Host-mediated targets in glioma invasionR21NS058776 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELICEIRI, BRIAN P, TORBETT, BRUCE EDWARD · 2008 to 2009
$424k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170140NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM078421NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS058776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) was the first pro-angiogenic molecule discovered, it has numerous activities on the growth and differentiation of non-vascular cell types. FGF2 is both stimulatory and inhibitory, depending on the cell type evaluated, the experimental design used and the context in which it is tested. Here, we investigated the effects of manipulating endogenous FGF2 on the development of mammary cancer to determine whether its endogenous contribution in vivo is pro- or anti-tumorigenic. Specifically, we examined the effects of FGF2 gene dosing in a cross between a spontaneous breast tumor model (PyVT+ mice) and FGF2-/- (FGF KO) mice. Using these mice, the onset and progression of mammary tumors was determined. As predicted, female FGF2 WT mice developed mammary tumors starting around 60 days after birth and by 80 days, 100% of FGF2 WT female mice had mammary tumors. In contrast, 80% of FGF2 KO female mice had no palpable tumors until nearly three weeks later (85 days) at times when 100% of the WT cohort was tumor positive. All FGF KO mice were tumor-bearing by 115 days. When we compared the onset of mammary tumor development and the tumor progression curves between FGF het and FGF KO mice, we observed a difference, which suggested a gene dosing effect. Analysis of the tumors demonstrated that there were significant differences in tumor size depending on FGF2 status. The delay in tumor onset supports a functional role for FGF2 in mammary tumor progression, but argues against an essential role for FGF2 in overall mammary tumor progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 2Gene DosageMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMice, KnockoutReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1Fibroblast Growth Factor 2Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1

Identifiers

PMID22407271
PMCPMC4224275
OpenAlexW2077802484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.