Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22406470›Full record

ReviewAntiviral research2012

Orthopoxvirus targets for the development of new antiviral agents.

Mark N Prichard, Earl R Kern

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antiviral research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A comprehensive overview of monkeypox virus disease.Tropical medicine and health · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhibition of Monkeypox Virus DNA Polymerase UsingIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Monkeypox Virus Infections in Humans.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  18. In Silico Repurposed Drugs against Monkeypox Virus.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark N PrichardDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233-1711, United States. mprichard@peds.uab.edu
Earl R Kern

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201100016CNIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015439NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030049NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-15439NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-30049PHS HHS HHSN272201100016I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investments in the development of new drugs for orthopoxvirus infections have fostered new avenues of research, provided an improved understanding of orthopoxvirus biology and yielded new therapies that are currently progressing through clinical trials. These broad-based efforts have also resulted in the identification of new inhibitors of orthopoxvirus replication that target many different stages of viral replication cycle. This review will discuss progress in the development of new anti-poxvirus drugs and the identification of new molecular targets that can be exploited for the development of new inhibitors. The prototype of the orthopoxvirus group is vaccinia virus and its replication cycle will be discussed in detail noting specific viral functions and their associated gene products that have the potential to serve as new targets for drug development. Progress that has been achieved in recent years should yield new drugs for the treatment of these infections and might also reveal new approaches for antiviral drug development with other viruses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsDrug DiscoveryHumansOrthopoxvirusVirus ReplicationAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22406470
PMCPMC3773844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.