ArticleVision research2012
Three-dimensional kinematics of saccadic and pursuit eye movements in humans: relationship between Donders' and Listing's laws.
Article in Vision research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurophysiology of Gaze Direction as Poly-Equilibrium.NeuroSci · 2025Review
- Direction and viewing area-sensitive influence of EOG artifacts revealed in the EEG topographic pattern analysis.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2016Article
- Eye-Movement Training Results in Changes in qEEG and NIH Stroke Scale in Subjects Suffering from Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Control Trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2016Article
- Kinematics of visually-guided eye movements.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
For Listing's law to be obeyed during eye movements, the "half-angle rule" must be satisfied: the eye velocity axis must tilt away from Listing's plane by half the angle of eye position eccentricity from primary position. We aimed to determine if this rule is satisfied during horizontal and vertical pursuit compared with saccades. Three-dimensional (3-d) eye rotation data were acquired from five normal head-fixed humans using the search coil technique. Saccades were recorded in response to 40° horizontal or vertical steps in target position, at different elevations and azimuths. Pursuit was recorded while tracking a target moving horizontally or vertically at 20°/s, with peak-to-peak amplitude of 40°, at the same elevations and azimuths. First- and second-order surfaces were fitted to 3-d eye position data from periods of fixation. In all subjects, eye positions did not lie on a planar surface, but on a twisted surface in 3-d space. The tilt-angle coefficient (TAC) during saccades and pursuit was calculated as the ratio of the angle of eye velocity axis tilt to the angle of eye position eccentricity. During horizontal saccades and pursuit, mean TACs were 0.58 and 0.64, respectively. During vertical saccades and pursuit, mean TACs were 0.35 and 0.43, respectively, and lower than their horizontal counterparts (p<0.05). These findings suggest that Listing's law is not perfectly satisfied during saccades or pursuit. On the basis of model simulations, we propose that the discrepancy in horizontal and vertical TACs causes eye positions to lie on a twisted rather than a planar surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.