Trial reportJournal of psychosomatic research2012
Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on response to cognitive behavior therapy for depression after an acute myocardial infarction.
Trial report in Journal of psychosomatic research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Sleep in older adults: normative changes, sleep disorders, and treatment options.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) interferes with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for depression in patients with coronary heart disease.
methodsPatients who were depressed within 28 days after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) were enrolled in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) trial; 289 (12%) of the 2481 participants in ENRICHD met the criteria for inclusion in this ancillary study.
resultsA validated ambulatory ECG algorithm was used to detect OSA. Of the 289 participants, 64 (22%) met the criteria for OSA. CBT was efficacious relative to usual care (UC) for depression (p=.004). OSA had no effect on 6-month Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores (p=.11), and there was no interaction between OSA and treatment (p=.42). However, the adjusted mean (s.e.) 6-month BDI scores among patients without OSA were 12.2 (0.8) vs. 9.0 (0.8) in the UC and CBT groups (Cohen's d=.40); among those with OSA, they were 9.5 (1.4) and 8.1 (1.5) in the UC and CBT groups (d=.17). There were no significant OSA×Treatment interactions in the major depression (n=131) or minor depression (n=158) subgroups, but in those with major depression, there was a larger treatment effect in those without (d=.44) than with (d=.09) OSA. In those with minor depression, the treatment effects were d=.37 and d=.25 for the non-OSA and OSA subgroups.
conclusionCBT is efficacious for depression after an acute myocardial infarction in patients without obstructive sleep apnea, but it may be less efficacious for post-MI patients with OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.