Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22404264›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2012

Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Nicholas Alexakis, Saxon Connor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04213092 ("Single Setting ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a Safe Procedure in Patients With Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04213092 completednot on this map

"Single Setting ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a Safe Procedure in Patients With Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis: A Prospective Study in a Peripheral-Level Hospital"

TypeobservationalSponsorLumbini Medical CollegeRan2012 to 2015Enrolled160ConditionsCholedocholithiasis With Cholecystitis With Obstruction, Choledocholithiasis With Acute and Chronic Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis With Acute and Chronic CholecystitisArmsERCP+LC, OC+CBD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Intraoperative Cholangiogram Interpretation for Laparoscopic Transcystic Bile Duct Exploration: Is Concurrence Possible?Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Choledocholithiasis-a new clinical pathway.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas AlexakisDepartment of Surgery, University of Athens School of Medicine, Hippocratio Hospital, Athens, Greece. nalexakis@yahoo.co.uk
Saxon Connor
Christchurch Hospital · NZNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study is a meta-analysis of English articles comparing one-stage [laparoscopic common bile duct exploration or intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)] vs. two-stage (laparoscopic cholecystectomy preceded or followed by ERCP) management of common bile duct stones.

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed and Science Citation Index databases (1990-2011) were searched for randomized, controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. Outcomes were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using RevMan 5.1.

resultsNine trials with 933 patients were studied. No significant differences was observed between the two groups with regard to bile duct clearance (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.21), mortality (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.32-4.52), total morbidity (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.06), major morbidity (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.60-1.52) and the need for additional procedures (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.76-3.30).

conclusionsOutcomes after one-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of bile duct stones are no different to the outcomes after two-stage management.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCommon Bile DuctEvidence-Based MedicineGallstonesHumansOdds RatioTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22404264
PMCPMC3371212
OpenAlexW2165671084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.