ArticleOmics : a journal of integrative biology2013
Proteome differences between male and female fetal cells in amniotic fluid.
Article in Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host-derived protein profiles of human neonatal meconium across gestational ages.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in Protein Expression and Their Perturbations in Amniotic Fluid Cells of Down Syndrome Fetuses.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Human body-fluid proteome: quantitative profiling and computational prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Oleuropein Induces AMPK-Dependent Autophagy in NAFLD Mice, Regardless of the Gender.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- The Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects of Bisphenol-A (BPA) in MCF-7 Cell Line and Amniocytes.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mammals, sex development is genetically and hormonally regulated. The process starts with the establishment of chromosomal structures (XY or XX), followed by the expression of sex-dependent genes. In order to elucidate the differential protein profiles between male and female amniocytes, a proteomic approach has been performed in this study. Here, we utilized a proteomics-based approach including 2D-DIGE and MALDI-TOF MS analysis to obtain differentially expressed proteins between male and female amniocytes. After resolving protein samples with 2D-DIGE technique, 45 proteins corresponding to 28 unique proteins were differentially expressed between male and female amninocytes from three independent batches of amniotic fluid. Of all of these unique identified spots, five of them (annexin A1, cathepsin D, cytoskeletal 19, protein disulfide-isomerase, and vimentin) exhibited more than 1.5-fold upregulation or downregulation in at least two independent experiments. Importantly, the identified proteins involved in protein degradation and protein folding display upregulated in male amniocytes, implying the differential regulations of protein degradation and protein folding during sex development. In conclusion, the identified differentially expressed proteins may be employed as potential signatures for the sex development. Moreover, the established proteomic platform might further utilize to discover the potential biomarkers for the prenatal genetic disorders in fetus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.