ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2012
Microbial CH(4) and N(2)O Consumption in Acidic Wetlands.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cattle-induced homogenization of microbial communities weakens the influence of geochemical gradients in small water bodies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The effects of drought on Sphagnum moss species and the implications for hydrology in peatlands.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Evaluation of microbial community dynamics and chlorinated solvent biodegradation in methane-amended microcosms from an acidic aquifer.Biodegradation · 2024Article
- Nitrous oxide respiration in acidophilic methanotrophs.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Meta-analysis shows the impacts of ecological restoration on greenhouse gas emissions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Synergy and competition during the anaerobic degradation of N-acetylglucosamine in a methane-emitting, subarctic, pH-neutral fen.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Spatial distribution of sediment bacterial communities from São Francisco River headwaters is influenced by human land-use activities and seasonal climate shifts.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- Acidophilic methanotrophs: Occurrence, diversity, and possible bioremediation applications.Environmental microbiology reports · 2023Review
- Prospecting the significance of methane-utilizing bacteria in agriculture.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
- Linking transcriptional dynamics of CHThe ISME journal · 2022Article
- Methanotrophs: Discoveries, Environmental Relevance, and a Perspective on Current and Future Applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Facultative methanotrophs - diversity, genetics, molecular ecology and biotechnological potential: a mini-review.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2020Review
- Methane Production in Soil Environments-Anaerobic Biogeochemistry and Microbial Life between Flooding and Desiccation.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- A Review of Landfill Microbiology and Ecology: A Call for Modernization With 'Next Generation' Technology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Drying-Rewetting and Flooding Impact Denitrifier Activity Rather than Community Structure in a Moderately Acidic Fen.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Denitrification activity of a remarkably diverse fen denitrifier community in finnish lapland is N-oxide limited.PloS one · 2015Article
- Shifts in methanogenic community composition and methane fluxes along the degradation of discontinuous permafrost.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Microbiology of wetlands.Frontiers in microbiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acidic wetlands are global sources of the atmospheric greenhouse gases methane (CH(4)), and nitrous oxide (N(2)O). Consumption of both atmospheric gases has been observed in various acidic wetlands, but information on the microbial mechanisms underlying these phenomena is scarce. A substantial amount of CH(4) is consumed in sub soil by aerobic methanotrophs at anoxic-oxic interfaces (e.g., tissues of Sphagnum mosses, rhizosphere of vascular plant roots). Methylocystis-related species are likely candidates that are involved in the consumption of atmospheric CH(4) in acidic wetlands. Oxygen availability regulates the activity of methanotrophs of acidic wetlands. Other parameters impacting on the methanotroph-mediated CH(4) consumption have not been systematically evaluated. N(2)O is produced and consumed by microbial denitrification, thus rendering acidic wetlands as temporary sources or sinks for N(2)O. Denitrifier communities in such ecosystems are diverse, and largely uncultured and/or new, and environmental factors that control their consumption activity are unresolved. Analyses of the composition of N(2)O reductase genes in acidic wetlands suggest that acid-tolerant Proteobacteria have the potential to mediate N(2)O consumption in such soils. Thus, the fragmented current state of knowledge raises open questions concerning methanotrophs and denitrifiers that consume atmospheric CH(4) and N(2)O in acidic wetlands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.