Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22403539›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2012

Combining collation and annotation efforts toward completion of the rat and mouse connectomes in BAMS.

Mihail Bota, Hong-Wei Dong, Larry W Swanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Architecture of the cerebral cortical association connectome underlying cognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mihail BotaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA, USA.
Hong-Wei Dong
Larry W Swanson

Funding

YALE CENTER FOR THE: LEARNING &ATTENTIONP41RR013642 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BEARER, ELAINE L · 1998 to 2011
$21.9M
The Mouse Connectome Project Phase III: Assembling the global neural networks of the mouse brainR01MH094360 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DONG, HONG-WEI · 2012 to 2021
$7.4M
A Mature Brain Architecture Knowledge Management SystemR01NS050792 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SWANSON, LARRY W · 2004 to 2012
$2.6M
Identify neuroendocrine genes that are vulnerable to chronic psychological stressR21MH083180 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DONG, HONG-WEI · 2009 to 2010
$424k
A Mature Brain Architecture Knowledge Management SystemR56NS050792 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SWANSON, LARRY W · 2008 to 2008
$423k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR013642NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094360NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH083180NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050792NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS050792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many different independently published neuroanatomical parcellation schemes (brain maps, nomenclatures, or atlases) can exist for a particular species, although one scheme (a standard scheme) is typically chosen for mapping neuroanatomical data in a particular study. This is problematic for building connection matrices (connectomes) because the terms used to name structures in different parcellation schemes differ widely and interrelationships are seldom defined. Therefore, data sets cannot be compared across studies that have been mapped on different neuroanatomical atlases without a reliable translation method. Because resliceable 3D brain models for relating systematically and topographically different parcellation schemes are still in the first phases of development, it is necessary to rely on qualitative comparisons between regions and tracts that are either inserted directly by neuroanatomists or trained annotators, or are extracted or inferred by collators from the available literature. To address these challenges, we developed a publicly available neuroinformatics system, the Brain Architecture Knowledge Management System (BAMS; http://brancusi.usc.edu/bkms). The structure and functionality of BAMS is briefly reviewed here, as an exemplar for constructing interrelated connectomes at different levels of the mammalian central nervous system organization. Next, the latest version of BAMS rat macroconnectome is presented because it is significantly more populated with the number of inserted connectivity reports exceeding a benchmark value (50,000), and because it is based on a different classification scheme. Finally, we discuss a general methodology and strategy for producing global connection matrices, starting with rigorous mapping of data, then inserting and annotating it, and ending with online generation of large-scale connection matrices.

Indexed as

BAMSconnectomedata collation and annotationdata miningmappingneuroanatomyneuroinformatics

Identifiers

PMID22403539
PMCPMC3289393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.