Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22403431›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Automating HIV drug resistance genotyping with RECall, a freely accessible sequence analysis tool.

Conan K Woods, Chanson J Brumme, Tommy F Liu, Celia K S Chui, Anna L Chu, Brian Wynhoven, Tom A Hall, Christina Trevino, Robert W Shafer, P Richard Harrigan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilizing HIV Proviral DNA to Assess for the Presence of HIV Drug Resistance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Conan K WoodsBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chanson J Brumme
Tommy F Liu
Celia K S Chui
Anna L Chu
Brian Wynhoven
Tom A Hall
Christina Trevino
Robert W Shafer
P Richard Harrigan

Funding

PUBLIC HIV DRUG RESISTANCE DATABASER01AI068581 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAFER, ROBERT WILLIAM · 2006 to 2017
$6.2M
CIHRNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotypic HIV drug resistance testing is routinely used to guide clinical decisions. While genotyping methods can be standardized, a slow, labor-intensive, and subjective manual sequence interpretation step is required. We therefore performed external validation of our custom software RECall, a fully automated sequence analysis pipeline. HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping was performed on 981 clinical samples at the Stanford Diagnostic Virology Laboratory. Sequencing trace files were first interpreted manually by a laboratory technician and subsequently reanalyzed by RECall, without intervention. The relative performances of the two methods were assessed by determination of the concordance of nucleotide base calls, identification of key resistance-associated substitutions, and HIV drug resistance susceptibility scoring by the Stanford Sierra algorithm. RECall is freely available at http://pssm.cfenet.ubc.ca. In total, 875 of 981 sequences were analyzed by both human and RECall interpretation. RECall analysis required minimal hands-on time and resulted in a 25-fold improvement in processing speed (∼150 technician-hours versus ∼6 computation-hours). Excellent concordance was obtained between human and automated RECall interpretation (99.7% agreement for >1,000,000 bases compared). Nearly all discordances (99.4%) were due to nucleotide mixtures being called by one method but not the other. Similarly, 98.6% of key antiretroviral resistance-associated mutations observed were identified by both methods, resulting in 98.5% concordance of resistance susceptibility interpretations. This automated sequence analysis tool provides both standardization of analysis and a significant improvement in data workflow. The time-consuming, error-prone, and dreadfully boring manual sequence analysis step is replaced with a fully automated system without compromising the accuracy of reported HIV drug resistance data.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralAnti-HIV AgentsAutomationGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular TypingSequence AnalysisTime FactorsVirologyAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22403431
PMCPMC3372133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.