Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22402315›Full record

ReviewMinerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology2012

Prostate cancer stem cell biology.

C Yu, Z Yao, Y Jiang, E T Keller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cancer stem cells in prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2013
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C YuDepartment of Urology and Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Z Yao
Y Jiang
E T Keller

Funding

Tumor microvesicle-mediated modulation of the bone microenvironmentP01CA093900 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PIENTA, KENNETH J. · 2004 to 2024
$29.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA0933900NCI NIH HHS P01 CA093900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) model provides insights into pathophysiology of cancers and their therapeutic response. The CSC model has been both controversial, yet provides a foundation to explore cancer biology. In this review, we provide an overview of CSC concepts, biology and potential therapeutic avenues. We then focus on prostate CSC including 1) their purported origin as either basal-derived or luminal-derived cells; 2) markers used for prostate CSC identification; 3) alterations of signaling pathways in prostate CSCs; 4) involvement of prostate CSCs in metastasis of PCa; and 5) microRNA-mediated regulation of prostate CSCs. Although definitive evidence for the identification and characterization of prostate CSCs still remains unclear, future directions pursuing therapeutic targets of CSCs may provide novel insights for the treatment of PCa.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansMaleMicroRNAsNeoplastic Stem CellsProstatic NeoplasmsSignal TransductionBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID22402315
PMCPMC3332041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.