ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2012
Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Engineered Xenogeneic Bone Scaffold with IL-10 Nanodelivery System: Immunomodulation and BMSC Fate Programming for Skull Defect Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026Review
- Advanced additive manufacturing in orthopedics: a comprehensive review of biomaterials, structural design, biological functions and clinical technology applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Article
- FIBER DIAMETER-DRIVEN MODULATION OF CELL BEHAVIOR IN DECM-ENRICHED ELECTROSPUN SCAFFOLDS FOR BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING.International journal of high speed electronics · 2026Article
- Core-shell silica and fluorogenic hyaluronan nanomaterials in magnesium hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Modern Approaches and Emerging Biological Therapies to Treat Fracture Nonunion.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Growth Factor-Free Engineered Biphasic Scaffold for Enhanced Bone Regeneration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Engineered Osteochondral Scaffolds with Bioactive Cartilage Zone for Enhanced Articular Cartilage Regeneration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Strategies for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering: Innovations for Scalable Bone Regeneration.Plastic and aesthetic research · 2025Article
- Correction to "Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration".ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
- Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative therapies: Advances, challenges and clinical prospects.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Synthetic Calcium-Phosphate Materials for Bone Grafting.Polymers · 2023Review
- Article
- Printing tissue-engineered scaffolds made of polycaprolactone and nano-hydroxyapatite with mechanical properties appropriate for trabecular bone substitutes.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- Microstructured Polymeric Fabrics Modulating the Paracrine Activity of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Strategies forBiomedical reports · 2023Review
- Smart Orthopedic Biomaterials and Implants.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Large-area or critical-sized bone defects pose a serious challenge in orthopedic surgery, as all current treatment options present with shortcomings. Bone tissue engineering offers a more promising alternative treatment strategy. However, this approach requires mechanically stable scaffolds that support homogenous bone formation throughout the scaffold thickness. Despite advances in scaffold fabrication, current scaffold-based techniques are unable to support uniform, three-dimensional bone regeneration, and are limited to only the scaffold surface in vitro and in vivo. This is mainly because of inadequate scaffold pore sizes (<200 μm) and accessible pore volume, and the associated limited oxygen diffusion and vascular invasion. In this study, we have adopted a method combining microsphere-sintering and porogen-leaching techniques to fabricate scaffolds with an increased accessible pore volume. Of the scaffolds developed, moderately porous poly(85 lactide-co-15 glycolide) (PLGA) microsphere scaffolds were selected as most advantageous, since they retain mechanical strength in the range of human cancellous bone and display a significantly higher accessible pore volume, which is attributed to an increased percentage of larger pores (i.e., size range 200-600 μm). Unlike control scaffolds with a limited pore size and an accessible pore volume, moderately porous scaffolds displayed increased oxygen diffusion, pre-osteoblast cell infiltration, proliferation, and survival throughout the entire scaffold. Furthermore, moderately porous PLGA microsphere scaffolds displayed enhanced and homogenous mineralization in vitro. Since these newly designed moderately porous scaffolds are weight bearing, are fully osteoconductive, and have the ability to support vascularization, they may serve as effective scaffolds for large-area bone defect repair/regeneration. In addition, this study demonstrates the ability to modulate scaffold porosity and, in turn, to develop oxygen tension-controlled matrices that are effective for large-area bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.