Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22401625›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Comparative genomics reveals evidence of marine adaptation in Salinispora species.

Kevin Penn, Paul R Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MAR4Journal of natural products · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Three Microbial Musketeers of the Seas:International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Habitat-adapted heterologous symbiontFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Six novel species of the obligate marine actinobacteriumInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Genomics of Marine Sponge-DerivedFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin PennCenter for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0204, USA.
Paul R Jensen
Scripps Institution of Oceanography · US

Funding

Exploration, conservation, & development of marine biodiversity in FijiU01TW007401 · FIC · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAY, MARK E · 2005 to 2013
$7.4M
A sequenced-based approach for improved small molecule discoveryR01GM086261 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JENSEN, PAUL R · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
FIC NIH HHS U01-TW007401-01NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM086261-O1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActinobacteria represent a consistent component of most marine bacterial communities yet little is known about the mechanisms by which these Gram-positive bacteria adapt to life in the marine environment. Here we employed a phylogenomic approach to identify marine adaptation genes in marine Actinobacteria. The focus was on the obligate marine actinomycete genus Salinispora and the identification of marine adaptation genes that have been acquired from other marine bacteria.

resultsFunctional annotation, comparative genomics, and evidence of a shared evolutionary history with bacteria from hyperosmotic environments were used to identify a pool of more than 50 marine adaptation genes. An Actinobacterial species tree was used to infer the likelihood of gene gain or loss in accounting for the distribution of each gene. Acquired marine adaptation genes were associated with electron transport, sodium and ABC transporters, and channels and pores. In addition, the loss of a mechanosensitive channel gene appears to have played a major role in the inability of Salinispora strains to grow following transfer to low osmotic strength media.

conclusionsThe marine Actinobacteria for which genome sequences are available are broadly distributed throughout the Actinobacterial phylogenetic tree and closely related to non-marine forms suggesting they have been independently introduced relatively recently into the marine environment. It appears that the acquisition of transporters in Salinispora spp. represents a major marine adaptation while gene loss is proposed to play a role in the inability of this genus to survive outside of the marine environment. This study reveals fundamental differences between marine adaptations in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and no common genetic basis for marine adaptation among the Actinobacteria analyzed.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsActinobacteriaAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiological TransportGene OrderGenes, BacterialMicromonosporaceaeOperonPhosphatesPhylogenySeawaterPhosphates

Identifiers

PMID22401625
PMCPMC3314556
OpenAlexW2131711237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.