ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2012
Blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical validation of continuous glucose monitoring in glycemic management of critically ill sepsis patients: A prospective randomized clinical study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Trial
- Performance of New Roche Cobas Pulse Glucose Meter Against Potential Interfering Substances and Hematocrit Variations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perioperative glycemic management in adults presenting for elective cardiac and non-cardiac surgery.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2023Review
- Clinical challenges of glycemic control in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Point accuracy and reliability of an interstitial continuous glucose-monitoring device in critically ill patients: a prospective study.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Observational
- Hyperglycemia in acute heart failure: an opportunity to intervene?Current heart failure reports · 2014Review
- Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Review
- Continuous glucose sensors for glycaemic control in the ICU: have we arrived?Critical care (London, England) · 2013Article
- Analysis: New point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for the hospital demonstrates satisfactory analytical accuracy using blood from critically ill patients--an important step toward improved blood glucose control in the hospital.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies on tight glycemic control by intensive insulin therapy abruptly changed the climate of limited interest in the problem of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients and reopened the discussion on accuracy and reliability of glucose sensor devices. This article describes important components of blood glucose measurements and their interferences with the focus on the intensive care unit setting. Typical methodologies, organized from analytical accuracy to clinical accuracy, to assess imprecision and bias of a glucose sensor are also discussed. Finally, a list of recommendations and requirements to be considered when evaluating (time-discrete) glucose sensor devices is given.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.