Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22401291›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2012

Comparative genomics and transcriptional profiles of Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2338 and a classically improved erythromycin over-producing strain.

Clelia Peano, Adelfia Talà, Giorgio Corti, Daniela Pasanisi, Miriana Durante, Giovanni Mita, Silvio Bicciato, Gianluca De Bellis, Pietro Alifano

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Study on differences in flavonoid synthesis inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequence of high-yield strainSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Engineering the Erythromycin-Producing StrainFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Clelia PeanoInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Via Fratelli Cervi 93, 20090 Segrate, Milano, Italy.
Adelfia Talà
Giorgio Corti
Daniela Pasanisi
Miriana Durante
Giovanni Mita
Silvio Bicciato
Gianluca De Bellis
Pietro Alifano
University of Salento · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITInstitute of Sciences of Food Production · ITNational Research Council · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe molecular mechanisms altered by the traditional mutation and screening approach during the improvement of antibiotic-producing microorganisms are still poorly understood although this information is essential to design rational strategies for industrial strain improvement. In this study, we applied comparative genomics to identify all genetic changes occurring during the development of an erythromycin overproducer obtained using the traditional mutate-and- screen method.

resultsCompared with the parental Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2338, the genome of the overproducing strain presents 117 deletion, 78 insertion and 12 transposition sites, with 71 insertion/deletion sites mapping within coding sequences (CDSs) and generating frame-shift mutations. Single nucleotide variations are present in 144 CDSs. Overall, the genomic variations affect 227 proteins of the overproducing strain and a considerable number of mutations alter genes of key enzymes in the central carbon and nitrogen metabolism and in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, resulting in the redirection of common precursors toward erythromycin biosynthesis. Interestingly, several mutations inactivate genes coding for proteins that play fundamental roles in basic transcription and translation machineries including the transcription anti-termination factor NusB and the transcription elongation factor Efp. These mutations, along with those affecting genes coding for pleiotropic or pathway-specific regulators, affect global expression profile as demonstrated by a comparative analysis of the parental and overproducer expression profiles. Genomic data, finally, suggest that the mutate-and-screen process might have been accelerated by mutations in DNA repair genes.

conclusionsThis study helps to clarify the mechanisms underlying antibiotic overproduction providing valuable information about new possible molecular targets for rationale strain improvement.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialGenomicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCarbonErythromycinMutationOpen Reading FramesSaccharopolysporaTranscription, GeneticAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCarbonErythromycin

Identifiers

PMID22401291
PMCPMC3359211
OpenAlexW2095381145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.