Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22399777›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Gap-junctional coupling of mammalian rod photoreceptors and its effect on visual detection.

Peter H Li, Jan Verweij, James H Long, Julie L Schnapf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interphotoreceptor coupling: an evolutionary perspective.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Rhodopsin-mediated light-off-induced protein kinase A activation in mouse rod photoreceptor cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Direct Evidence for Daily Plasticity of Electrical Coupling between Rod Photoreceptors in the Mammalian Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sparsity and compressed coding in sensory systems.PLoS computational biology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter H LiDepartments of Ophthalmology and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Jan Verweij
James H Long
Julie L Schnapf
University of California, San Francisco · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAKKARAJU, APARNA · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
SIGNAL PROCESSING IN THE RETINAR01EY007642 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHNAPF, JULIE L · 1988 to 2011
$3.7M
NEI NIH HHS EY02162NEI NIH HHS EY07642NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of gap junctions between rods in mammalian retina suggests a role for rod-rod coupling in human vision. Rod coupling is known to reduce response variability, but because junctional conductances are not known, the downstream effects on visual performance are uncertain. Here we assessed rod coupling in guinea pig retina by measuring: (1) the variability in responses to dim flashes, (2) Neurobiotin tracer coupling, and (3) junctional conductances. Results were consolidated into an electrical network model and a model of human psychophysical detection. Guinea pig rods form tracer pools of 1 to ∼20 rods, with junctional conductances averaging ∼350 pS. We calculate that coupling will reduce human dark-adapted sensitivity ∼10% by impairing the noise filtering of the synapse between rods and rod bipolar cells. However, coupling also mitigates synaptic saturation and is thus calculated to improve sensitivity when stimuli are spatially restricted or are superimposed over background illumination.

Indexed as

AnimalsDark AdaptationFemaleGap JunctionsGuinea PigsHumansMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22399777
PMCPMC3319459
OpenAlexW1977307359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.