Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22399751›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Rodents rely on Merkel cells for texture discrimination tasks.

Stephen M Maricich, Kristin M Morrison, Erin L Mathes, Brittany M Brewer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and regeneration of Merkel cells.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex-Dependent Reduction in Mechanical Allodynia in the Sural-Sparing Nerve Injury Model in Mice Lacking Merkel Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen M MaricichDepartment of Pediatrics and Departments of Dermatology, Neurosciences, and Otolaryngology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. smm18@case.edu
Kristin M Morrison
Erin L Mathes
Brittany M Brewer
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

The role of Atoh1 in the development and function of Merkel cellsR01AR059114 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARICICH, STEPHEN M · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Dependence of Rhombic Lip Derivatives on Math1K08NS053419 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARICICH, STEPHEN M · 2006 to 2010
$857k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR05114NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059114NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS053419NINDS NIH HHS K08NS053419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cutaneous somatosensory system contains multiple types of mechanoreceptors that detect different mechanical stimuli (Johnson, 2001). These stimuli, either alone or in combination, are ultimately interpreted by the brain as different aspects of the sense of touch. Psychophysical and electrophysiological experiments in humans and other mammals implicate one of these mechanoreceptors, the Merkel cell/neurite complex, in two-point discrimination and the detection of curvature, shape, and texture (Johnson and Lamb, 1981; Johnson et al., 2000; Johnson, 2001). However, whether Merkel cell/neurite complex function is required for the detection of these stimuli is unknown. We genetically engineered mice that lack Merkel cells (Maricich et al., 2009; Morrison et al., 2009) to directly test the hypothesis that Merkel cell/neurite complexes are necessary to perform these types of sensory discrimination tasks. We found that mice devoid of Merkel cells could not detect textured surfaces with their feet while other measures of motor and sensory function were unaffected. Interestingly, these mice retained the ability to discriminate both texture and shape using their whiskers, suggesting that other somatosensory afferents can functionally substitute for Merkel cell/neurite complexes in this sensory organ. These findings suggest that Merkel cell/neurite complexes are essential for texture discrimination tasks involving glabrous skin but not whiskers.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleMaleMerkel CellsMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicNeuritesPsychomotor PerformanceTouchVibrissae

Identifiers

PMID22399751
PMCPMC3306053
OpenAlexW2026263874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.