Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22399572›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

The origin, global distribution, and functional impact of the human 8p23 inversion polymorphism.

Maximilian P A Salm, Stuart D Horswell, Claire E Hutchison, Helen E Speedy, Xia Yang, Liming Liang, Eric E Schadt, William O Cookson, Anthony S Wierzbicki, Rossi P Naoumova and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of an 8p23.1 Inversion Using High-Resolution Optical Genome Mapping.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic architecture and functional effects of potential human inversion supergenes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Maximilian P A SalmCentre for Endocrinology, Barts & the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. max.salm05@imperial.ac.uk
Stuart D Horswell
Claire E Hutchison
Helen E Speedy
Xia Yang
Liming Liang
Eric E Schadt
William O Cookson
Anthony S Wierzbicki
Rossi P Naoumova
Carol C Shoulders
Queen Mary University of London · GBSage Bionetworks · USCancer Research UK · GBImperial College London · GBLung Institute · USMassachusetts Department of Public Health · USSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council G1000758Medical Research Council MC_U120074258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic inversions are an increasingly recognized source of genetic variation. However, a lack of reliable high-throughput genotyping assays for these structures has precluded a full understanding of an inversion's phylogenetic, phenotypic, and population genetic properties. We characterize these properties for one of the largest polymorphic inversions in man (the ∼4.5-Mb 8p23.1 inversion), a structure that encompasses numerous signals of natural selection and disease association. We developed and validated a flexible bioinformatics tool that utilizes SNP data to enable accurate, high-throughput genotyping of the 8p23.1 inversion. This tool was applied retrospectively to diverse genome-wide data sets, revealing significant population stratification that largely follows a clinal "serial founder effect" distribution model. Phylogenetic analyses establish the inversion's ancestral origin within the Homo lineage, indicating that 8p23.1 inversion has occurred independently in the Pan lineage. The human inversion breakpoint was localized to an inverted pair of human endogenous retrovirus elements within the large, flanking low-copy repeats; experimental validation of this breakpoint confirmed these elements as the likely intermediary substrates that sponsored inversion formation. In five data sets, mRNA levels of disease-associated genes were robustly associated with inversion genotype. Moreover, a haplotype associated with systemic lupus erythematosus was restricted to the derived inversion state. We conclude that the 8p23.1 inversion is an evolutionarily dynamic structure that can now be accommodated into the understanding of human genetic and phenotypic diversity.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionChromosomes, Human, Pair 8Polymorphism, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMolecular Sequence DataPan troglodytesPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22399572
PMCPMC3371712
OpenAlexW2018775283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.